These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1946948)

  • 1. Evaluation of a dental unit with a built-in decontamination system.
    Douglas CW; Rothwell PS
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Sep; 22(9):721-6. PubMed ID: 1946948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of an automated dental unit water system's contamination control protocol.
    Puttaiah R; Svoboda KK; Lin SM; Montebugnoli L; Dolci G; Spratt D; Siebert J
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jan; 13(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 22430686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Disinfection and sterilization in dentistry. Use of potentiated glutaraldehyde (DIBA-GLAXO) in the water systems of dentistry units: analysis of microbiological activity, physico-chemical compatibility and residues in washing water.
    Urbani G; Cavalleri G; Gotte P
    Clin Trials J; 1990; 27(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 10147690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bacterial contamination of the water supply in newly installed dental units.
    Williams HN; Johnson A; Kelley JI; Baer ML; King TS; Mitchell B; Hasler JF
    Quintessence Int; 1995 May; 26(5):331-7. PubMed ID: 7568755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A novel automated waterline cleaning system that facilitates effective and consistent control of microbial biofilm contamination of dental chair unit waterlines: a one-year study.
    O'Donnell MJ; Shore AC; Coleman DC
    J Dent; 2006 Oct; 34(9):648-61. PubMed ID: 16442201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Failure of anti-retraction valves and the procedure for between patient flushing: a rationale for chemical control of dental unit waterline contamination.
    Montebugnoli L; Dolci G; Spratt DA; Puttaiah R
    Am J Dent; 2005 Aug; 18(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 16296436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the efficacy of glutaraldehyde and peroxygen for disinfection of dental instruments.
    Angelillo IF; Bianco A; Nobile CG; Pavia M
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 1998 Nov; 27(5):292-6. PubMed ID: 9830148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dental unit water: bacterial decontamination of old and new dental units by flushing water.
    Watanabe E; Agostinho AM; Matsumoto W; Ito I
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2008 Feb; 6(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 18205655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Aerosol disinfection of bacterial spores].
    Theilen U; Wilsberg FJ; Böhm R; Strauch D
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B Umwelthyg Krankenhaushyg Arbeitshyg Prav Med; 1987 Jun; 184(3-4):229-52. PubMed ID: 3116785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A between-patient disinfection method to control water line contamination and biofilm inside dental units.
    Montebugnoli L; Chersoni S; Prati C; Dolci G
    J Hosp Infect; 2004 Apr; 56(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 15066741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laboratory evaluation of anti-biofilm agents for use in dental unit waterlines.
    Meiller TF; Kelley JI; Baqui AA; DePaola LG
    J Clin Dent; 2001; 12(4):97-103. PubMed ID: 11507923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microbial contamination in dental unit waterlines: comparison between Er:YAG laser and turbine lines.
    Sacchetti R; Baldissarri A; De Luca G; Lucca P; Stampi S; Zanetti F
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2006; 13(2):275-9. PubMed ID: 17196001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of a glutaraldehyde formulation in decontamination of dental unit water systems.
    Gigola P; Angelillo V; Garusi G
    Minerva Stomatol; 2006; 55(7-8):437-48. PubMed ID: 17041544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of steam sterilization in killing spores of Bacillus stearothermophilus in prophylaxis angles.
    Barnes CM; Anderson NA; Li Y; Caufield PW
    Gen Dent; 1994; 42(5):456-8. PubMed ID: 7489880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microbiological evaluation of a newly designed dental air-turbine handpiece for anti-cross contaminations.
    Ohsuka S; Ohta M; Masuda K; Kaneda T; Ueda M
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(3):201-8. PubMed ID: 7916884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inhibitory effect of PVDF tubes on biofilm formation in dental unit waterlines.
    Yabune T; Imazato S; Ebisu S
    Dent Mater; 2005 Aug; 21(8):780-6. PubMed ID: 16026668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bacterial decontamination of DUWL biofilm using Oxygenal 6.
    Szymańska J
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2006; 13(1):163-7. PubMed ID: 16841887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The rapid sterilization of gutta-percha cones with sodium hypochlorite and glutaraldehyde.
    Ozalp N; Okte Z; Ozcelik B
    J Endod; 2006 Dec; 32(12):1202-4. PubMed ID: 17174684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reducing bacterial counts in dental unit waterlines: distilled water vs. antimicrobial agents.
    Kettering JD; Muñoz-Viveros CA; Stephens JA; Naylor WP; Zhang W
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2002 Oct; 30(10):735-41. PubMed ID: 12403476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Control of bacteria in dental water supplies.
    Douglas CW; van Noort R
    Br Dent J; 1993 Mar; 174(5):167-74. PubMed ID: 8499024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.