These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19469598)

  • 1. Using revealed mate preferences to evaluate market force and differential preference explanations for mate selection.
    Wood D; Brumbaugh CC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jun; 96(6):1226-44. PubMed ID: 19469598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The mere presence of opposite-sex others on judgments of sexual and romantic desirability: opposite effects for men and women.
    Hill SE; Buss DM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 May; 34(5):635-47. PubMed ID: 18303129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fluctuating asymmetry, sociosexuality, and intrasexual competitive tactics.
    Simpson JA; Gangestad SW; Christensen PN; Leck K
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1999 Jan; 76(1):159-72. PubMed ID: 9972561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of partner beauty on opposite-sex attractiveness judgments.
    Little AC; Caldwell CA; Jones BC; DeBruine LM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1119-27. PubMed ID: 21901646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of visual exposure to the opposite sex: cognitive aspects of mate attraction in human males.
    Roney JR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Mar; 29(3):393-404. PubMed ID: 15273016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Female condition influences preferences for sexual dimorphism in faces of male humans (Homo sapiens).
    Penton-Voak IS; Little AC; Jones BC; Burt DM; Tiddeman BP; Perrett DI
    J Comp Psychol; 2003 Sep; 117(3):264-71. PubMed ID: 14498802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: testing the tradeoffs.
    Li NP; Bailey JM; Kenrick DT; Linsenmeier JA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Jun; 82(6):947-55. PubMed ID: 12051582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. I'm hot, so i'd say you're not: the influence of objective physical attractiveness on mate selection.
    Montoya RM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1315-31. PubMed ID: 18599658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of active assortment in spousal similarity.
    Watson D; Beer A; McDade-Montez E
    J Pers; 2014 Apr; 82(2):116-29. PubMed ID: 23551151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty.
    Rhodes G
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2006; 57():199-226. PubMed ID: 16318594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Warm and homely or cold and beautiful? Sex differences in trading off traits in mate selection.
    Fletcher GJ; Tither JM; O'Loughlin C; Friesen M; Overall N
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2004 Jun; 30(6):659-72. PubMed ID: 15155031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Individual differences in mate poaching: an examination of hormonal, dispositional, and behavioral mate-value traits.
    Sunderani S; Arnocky S; Vaillancourt T
    Arch Sex Behav; 2013 May; 42(4):533-42. PubMed ID: 22695642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Male versus female mate choice: sexual selection and the evolution of species recognition via reinforcement.
    Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2007 Dec; 61(12):2772-89. PubMed ID: 17924955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of a parenting prime on sex differences in mate selection criteria.
    Millar MG; Ostlund NM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Nov; 32(11):1459-68. PubMed ID: 17030888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of group status on physical attractiveness preferences--from the Japanese case to a general cognitive perspective.
    Kowner R
    Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr; 1996 May; 122(2):215-48. PubMed ID: 8674998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mate choice decisions: the role of facial beauty.
    Johnston VS
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 Jan; 10(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 16311066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner?
    Eastwick PW; Finkel EJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Feb; 94(2):245-64. PubMed ID: 18211175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. More than just a pretty face and a hot body: multiple cues in mate-choice.
    Jonason PK; Raulston T; Rotolo A
    J Soc Psychol; 2012; 152(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 22468419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Women's estradiol predicts preference for facial cues of men's testosterone.
    Roney JR; Simmons ZL
    Horm Behav; 2008 Jan; 53(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 17950291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sociosexuality predicts women's preferences for symmetry in men's faces.
    Quist MC; Watkins CD; Smith FG; Little AC; Debruine LM; Jones BC
    Arch Sex Behav; 2012 Dec; 41(6):1415-21. PubMed ID: 21882053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.