169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1947105)
21. [High intensification film-screen systems in thoracic diagnosis. A clinical comparative study].
Schäfer CB; Sokiranski R; Claussen CD
Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Nov; 5(6):389-93. PubMed ID: 8580141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Chest image quality: film-screen vs. computed radiography.
Freedman M
Adm Radiol; 1991 Jul; 10(7):38-40, 42. PubMed ID: 10170769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Improved control of image optical density with low-dose digital and conventional radiography in bedside imaging.
Schaefer CM; Greene RE; Oestmann JW; Kamalsky JM; Hall DA; Llewellyn HJ; Robertson CL; Rhea JT; Rosenthal H; Rubens JR
Radiology; 1989 Dec; 173(3):713-6. PubMed ID: 2813775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography.
Elam EA; Rehm K; Hillman BJ; Maloney K; Fajardo LL; McNeill K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):509-14. PubMed ID: 1738985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Thoracic radiographs with the AMBER system. A comparison of the diagnostic image quality of film-screen and storage-phosphor radiographs on the grid-partition stand and the AMBER system].
Busch HP; Hartmann J; Freund MC; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M; Richter K
Rofo; 1992 Mar; 156(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 1550921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Chest radiography: depiction of normal anatomy and pathologic structures with selenium-based digital radiography versus conventional screen-film radiography.
Woodard PK; Slone RM; Gierada DS; Reiker GG; Pilgram TK; Jost RG
Radiology; 1997 Apr; 203(1):197-201. PubMed ID: 9122392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Can digital luminescent radiography substitute for conventional x-ray technics in chest radiography?].
Neufang KF; Krug B; Lorenz R; Steinbrich W
Rofo; 1990 May; 152(5):501-9. PubMed ID: 2160680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Threshold perception performance with computed and screen-film radiography: implications for chest radiography.
Dobbins JT; Rice JJ; Beam CA; Ravin CE
Radiology; 1992 Apr; 183(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 1549669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration.
Hamer OW; Sirlin CB; Strotzer M; Borisch I; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Völk M
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):691-700. PubMed ID: 16192324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of the injured cervical spine: comparison of conventional and storage phosphor radiography with a hybrid cassette.
Wilson AJ; Mann FA; West OC; McEnery KW; Murphy WA
Radiology; 1994 Nov; 193(2):419-22. PubMed ID: 7972756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [New analog and digital imaging techniques for chest diagnosis--principles--clinical value--economics].
Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8448232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinations.
Andriole KP
J Digit Imaging; 2002 Sep; 15(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 12532253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Detection of CT-proved pulmonary nodules: comparison of selenium-based digital and conventional screen-film chest radiographs.
Woodard PK; Slone RM; Sagel SS; Fleishman MJ; Gutierrez FR; Reiker GG; Pilgram TK; Jost RG
Radiology; 1998 Dec; 209(3):705-9. PubMed ID: 9844662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Digital chest imaging with a selenium detector: comparison with conventional radiography for visualization of specific anatomic regions of the chest.
van Heesewijk HP; Neitzel U; van der Graaf Y; de Valois JC; Feldberg MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Sep; 165(3):535-40. PubMed ID: 7645464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical experience with an advanced laser digitizer for cost-effective digital radiography.
MacMahon H; Xu XW; Hoffmann KR; Giger ML; Yoshimura H; Doi K; Carlin M; Kano A; Yao L; Abe K
Radiographics; 1993 May; 13(3):635-45; discussion 645-6. PubMed ID: 8316670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of exposure variation on the clinical utility of chest radiographs.
Slone RM; Van Metter R; Senol E; Muka E; Pilgram TK
Radiology; 1996 May; 199(2):497-504. PubMed ID: 8668802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Digital chest x-rays with a selenium detector: a prospective comparison with a conventional film-screen combination].
Freund M; Reuter M; Palmié S; Harder E; Hutzelmann A; Heller M
Rofo; 1997 Feb; 166(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 9116250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Intraoperative arteriography: comparison of conventional screen-film with photostimulable imaging plate radiographs.
Pond GD; Seeley GW; Ovitt TW; Chernin MM; Yoshino MT; Roehrig H; McIntyre KE
Radiology; 1989 Feb; 170(2):367-70. PubMed ID: 2911659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A new asymmetric screen-film combination for conventional chest radiography: evaluation in 50 patients.
Swensen SJ; Gray JE; Brown LR; Aughenbaugh GL; Harms GF; Stears J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):483-6. PubMed ID: 8430540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
