These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1947114)

  • 1. Sensitometric responses of selected medical radiographic films.
    Kofler JM; Gray JE
    Radiology; 1991 Dec; 181(3):879-83. PubMed ID: 1947114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of light and x-ray sensitometric responses of double-emulsion films for different processing conditions.
    Blendl C; Buhr E
    Med Phys; 2001 Dec; 28(12):2420-6. PubMed ID: 11797944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Problems associated with simulated light sensitometry for low-crossover medical x-ray films.
    Haus AG; Dickerson RE
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(4):691-5. PubMed ID: 2215416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Method of simulated screen sensitometry for asymmetric, low crossover medical x-ray films.
    Dickerson RE; Haus AG; Baker CW
    Med Phys; 1994 Apr; 21(4):525-8. PubMed ID: 8058018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison and variations of the speed of radiographic film.
    Daniels C; Holloway AF
    Radiology; 1983 Jan; 146(1):203-7. PubMed ID: 6849046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The influence of the spectrum and the type of exposure on the contrast of double-sided coated x-ray film].
    Blendl C; Bollen R; Freytag KH
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1992 Nov; 2(6):339-44. PubMed ID: 1457475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variation of the sensitometric characteristics of seven mammographic films with processing conditions.
    Tsalafoutas IA; Dimakopoulou AD; Koulentianos ED; Serefoglou AN; Yakoumakis EN
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Aug; 77(920):666-71. PubMed ID: 15326045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using light sensitometry to evaluate mammography film performance.
    West MS; Spelic DC
    Med Phys; 2000 May; 27(5):854-60. PubMed ID: 10841387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of five methods for monitoring the precision of automated x-ray film processors.
    Nickoloff EL; Leo F; Reese M
    Radiology; 1978 Nov; 129(2):509-14. PubMed ID: 704868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Checking the consistency of sensitometers and film processors in a mammographic screening programme.
    Law J
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Feb; 69(818):143-7. PubMed ID: 8785642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Sensitometric characteristics of medical roentgenographic and fluorographic films. Sensitivity of the amplifying screens combined with a film].
    Gurvich AM; Erofeeva ND; Katomina RV; Maslov LA
    Med Tekh; 1976; (2):17-22. PubMed ID: 1030760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A time-scale sensitometric method for evaluating screen-film systems.
    Góes EG; Pelá CA; Ghilardi NT
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Oct; 42(10):1939-46. PubMed ID: 9364589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Processor quality control in laser imaging systems.
    Bogucki TM; Murphy WR; Baker CW; Piazza SS; Haus AG
    Med Phys; 1997 Apr; 24(4):581-4. PubMed ID: 9127311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of film processing temperature and time on mammographic image quality.
    Brink C; de Villiers JF; Lötter MG; van Zyl M
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Aug; 66(788):685-90. PubMed ID: 7719681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Problems with film processing in medical X-ray imaging in Lithuania.
    Sniureviciute M; Adliene D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):260-3. PubMed ID: 15933118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of poor control of film processors on mammographic image quality.
    Kimme-Smith C; Sun H; Bassett LW; Gold RH
    Radiographics; 1992 Nov; 12(6):1137-46. PubMed ID: 1439016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mammography film processor replenishment rate: bromide level monitoring.
    Kimme-Smith C; Wuelfing P; Kitts EL; Cagnon C; Basic M; Bassett L
    Med Phys; 1997 Mar; 24(3):369-72. PubMed ID: 9089588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interinstitutional variations of sensitometric curves of radiographic dosimetric films.
    Bos LJ; Danciu C; Cheng CW; Brugmans MJ; van der Horst A; Minken A; Mijnheer BJ
    Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1772-80. PubMed ID: 12201424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A comparison of various methods of x-ray sensitometry].
    Maslov LA; Gurvich AM; Chikirdin EG; Il'ina MA; Popova TA
    Med Tekh; 1988; (5):36-41. PubMed ID: 3200152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Assessment of the quality of radiographic medical films and chemicals for photochemical treatment].
    Larionov VN; Leont'ev VG; Kalashnikova LN
    Med Tekh; 2001; (6):31-4. PubMed ID: 11837193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.