110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19471386)
1. Optimization of the signal-to-noise ratio of frequency-domain instrumentation for near-infrared spectro-imaging of the human brain.
Toronov V; D'Amico E; Hueber D; Gratton E; Barbieri B; Webb A
Opt Express; 2003 Oct; 11(21):2717-29. PubMed ID: 19471386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Depth sensitivity of frequency domain optical measurements in diffusive media.
Binzoni T; Sassaroli A; Torricelli A; Spinelli L; Farina A; Durduran T; Cavalieri S; Pifferi A; Martelli F
Biomed Opt Express; 2017 Jun; 8(6):2990-3004. PubMed ID: 28663921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Signal-to-noise analysis of biomedical photoacoustic measurements in time and frequency domains.
Telenkov S; Mandelis A
Rev Sci Instrum; 2010 Dec; 81(12):124901. PubMed ID: 21198041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Investigation of effect of modulation frequency on high-density diffuse optical tomography image quality.
Fan W; Dehghani H; Eggebrecht AT
Neurophotonics; 2021 Oct; 8(4):045002. PubMed ID: 34849379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of noise on MTF calculations using different phantoms.
González-López A
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1889-1898. PubMed ID: 29500817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experimental verification of conditions for near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS).
Klaessens JH; Thijssen JM; Hopman JC; Liem KD
Technol Health Care; 2003; 11(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 12590158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A high-precision magnetoencephalographic study of human auditory steady-state responses to amplitude-modulated tones.
Ross B; Borgmann C; Draganova R; Roberts LE; Pantev C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Aug; 108(2):679-91. PubMed ID: 10955634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimal source-modulation frequencies for transport-theory-based optical tomography of small-tissue volumes.
Kim HK; Netz UJ; Beuthan J; Hielscher AH
Opt Express; 2008 Oct; 16(22):18082-101. PubMed ID: 18958087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spatial frequency spectrum of the x-ray scatter distribution in CBCT projections.
Bootsma GJ; Verhaegen F; Jaffray DA
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111901. PubMed ID: 24320434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimization of time domain diffuse correlation spectroscopy parameters for measuring brain blood flow.
Mazumder D; Wu MM; Ozana N; Tamborini D; Franceschini MA; Carp SA
Neurophotonics; 2021 Jul; 8(3):035005. PubMed ID: 34395719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Modulation frequency selection and efficient look-up table inversion for frequency domain diffuse optical spectroscopy.
Applegate M; Gómez C; Roblyer D
J Biomed Opt; 2021 Mar; 26(3):. PubMed ID: 33768742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Next-generation frequency domain diffuse optical imaging systems using silicon photomultipliers.
Kitsmiller VJ; O'Sullivan TD
Opt Lett; 2019 Feb; 44(3):562-565. PubMed ID: 30702679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monte Carlo simulation of time-dependent, transport-limited fluorescent boundary measurements in frequency domain.
Pan T; Rasmussen JC; Lee JH; Sevick-Muraca EM
Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1298-311. PubMed ID: 17500461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of the frequency-domain multi-distance method to evaluate the brain optical properties: Monte Carlo simulations from neonate to adult.
Dehaes M; Grant PE; Sliva DD; Roche-Labarbe N; Pienaar R; Boas DA; Franceschini MA; Selb J
Biomed Opt Express; 2011 Feb; 2(3):552-67. PubMed ID: 21412461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between pulsed laser and frequency-domain photoacoustic modalities: signal-to-noise ratio, contrast, resolution, and maximum depth detectivity.
Lashkari B; Mandelis A
Rev Sci Instrum; 2011 Sep; 82(9):094903. PubMed ID: 21974612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Studies of performance of antiscatter grids in digital radiography: effect on signal-to-noise ratio.
Chan HP; Lam KL; Wu YZ
Med Phys; 1990; 17(4):655-64. PubMed ID: 2215411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spectro-temporal modulation masking patterns reveal frequency selectivity.
Oetjen A; Verhey JL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):714-23. PubMed ID: 25698006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of ultrasound modulation of near infrared light on the quantification of scattering coefficient.
Singh MS; Yalavarthy PK; Vasu RM; Rajan K
Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 37(7):3744-51. PubMed ID: 20831082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Brain structure and spatial sensitivity profile assessing by near-infrared spectroscopy modeling based on 3D MRI data.
Chuang CC; Chen CM; Hsieh YS; Liu TC; Sun CW
J Biophotonics; 2013 Mar; 6(3):267-74. PubMed ID: 22678984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Time domain functional NIRS imaging for human brain mapping.
Torricelli A; Contini D; Pifferi A; Caffini M; Re R; Zucchelli L; Spinelli L
Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 85 Pt 1():28-50. PubMed ID: 23747285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
