281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19472626)
21. Comparison study of reconstruction algorithms for prototype digital breast tomosynthesis using various breast phantoms.
Kim YS; Park HS; Lee HH; Choi YW; Choi JG; Kim HH; Kim HJ
Radiol Med; 2016 Feb; 121(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 26383027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effects on image quality of a 2D antiscatter grid in x-ray digital breast tomosynthesis: Initial experience using the dual modality (x-ray and molecular) breast tomosynthesis scanner.
Patel T; Peppard H; Williams MB
Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1720. PubMed ID: 27036570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Monte Carlo simulation for the estimation of the glandular breast dose for a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
Rodrigues L; Magalhaes LA; Braz D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Dec; 167(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 25480841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical experience of photon counting breast tomosynthesis: comparison with traditional mammography.
Svane G; Azavedo E; Lindman K; Urech M; Nilsson J; Weber N; Lindqvist L; Ullberg C
Acta Radiol; 2011 Mar; 52(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 21498340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Optimization of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) acquisition parameters for human observers: effect of reconstruction algorithms.
Zeng R; Badano A; Myers KJ
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Apr; 62(7):2598-2611. PubMed ID: 28151728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A Case for Wide-Angle Breast Tomosynthesis.
Samei E; Thompson J; Richard S; Bowsher J
Acad Radiol; 2015 Jul; 22(7):860-9. PubMed ID: 25920335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cascaded systems analysis of shift-variant image quality in slit-scanning breast tomosynthesis.
Berggren K; Cederström B; Lundqvist M; Fredenberg E
Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4392-4401. PubMed ID: 30091470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Optimization of configuration parameters in a newly developed digital breast tomosynthesis system.
Park HS; Kim YS; Kim HJ; Choi YW; Choi JG
J Radiat Res; 2014 May; 55(3):589-99. PubMed ID: 24297999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Characterization of photon-counting multislit breast tomosynthesis.
Berggren K; Cederström B; Lundqvist M; Fredenberg E
Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):549-560. PubMed ID: 29159881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of reconstruction algorithms for a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system using a carbon nanotube X-ray source array.
Hu Z; Chen Z; Zhou C; Hong X; Chen J; Zhang Q; Jiang C; Ge Y; Yang Y; Liu X; Zheng H; Li Z; Liang D
J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(6):1157-1169. PubMed ID: 32925159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Optimization of a dual-energy contrast-enhanced technique for a photon-counting digital breast tomosynthesis system: I. A theoretical model.
Carton AK; Ullberg C; Lindman K; Acciavatti R; Francke T; Maidment AD
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5896-907. PubMed ID: 21158302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Optimal photon energy comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and mammography: a case study.
Di Maria S; Baptista M; Felix M; Oliveira N; Matela N; Janeiro L; Vaz P; Orvalho L; Silva A
Phys Med; 2014 Jun; 30(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 24613514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. INDIVIDUALISED CALCULATION OF TISSUE IMPARTED ENERGY IN BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS.
Geeraert N; Klausz R; Muller S; Bloch I; Bosmans H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):267-73. PubMed ID: 27127209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Digital breast tomosynthesis: studies of the effects of acquisition geometry on contrast-to-noise ratio and observer preference of low-contrast objects in breast phantom images.
Goodsitt MM; Chan HP; Schmitz A; Zelakiewicz S; Telang S; Hadjiiski L; Watcharotone K; Helvie MA; Paramagul C; Neal C; Christodoulou E; Larson SC; Carson PL
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Oct; 59(19):5883-902. PubMed ID: 25211509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Feasibility study of shutter scan acquisition for region of interest (ROI) digital tomosynthesis.
Kim D; Jo B; Lee D; Lee H; Choi S; Kim H; Chao Z; Choi S; Kim HJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):301-309. PubMed ID: 29493082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comprehensive assessment of the slice sensitivity profiles in breast tomosynthesis and breast CT.
Nosratieh A; Yang K; Aminololama-Shakeri S; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7254-61. PubMed ID: 23231276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Image quality evaluation of breast tomosynthesis with synchrotron radiation.
Malliori A; Bliznakova K; Speller RD; Horrocks JA; Rigon L; Tromba G; Pallikarakis N
Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5621-34. PubMed ID: 22957628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Detection of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis using complementary information of simulated projection.
Kim ST; Kim DH; Ro YM
Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):7043-58. PubMed ID: 26632059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Observation of super-resolution in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Acciavatti RJ; Maidment AD
Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7518-39. PubMed ID: 23231301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
