210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19472640)
1. Characterization of a mammographic system based on single photon counting pixel arrays coupled to GaAs x-ray detectors.
Amendolia SR; Bisogni MG; Delogu P; Fantacci ME; Paternoster G; Rosso V; Stefanini A
Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1330-9. PubMed ID: 19472640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the performance of digital mammography systems.
Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Guntern D; Verdun FR
Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):906-14. PubMed ID: 17441236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detective quantum efficiency of photon-counting x-ray detectors.
Tanguay J; Yun S; Kim HK; Cunningham IA
Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):491-509. PubMed ID: 25563288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Physical characterization of a scanning photon counting digital mammography system based on Si-strip detectors.
Aslund M; Cederström B; Lundqvist M; Danielsson M
Med Phys; 2007 Jun; 34(6):1918-25. PubMed ID: 17654894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of the detective quantum efficiency of a developmental detector for digital mammography.
Williams MB; Simoni PU; Smilowitz L; Stanton M; Phillips W; Stewart A
Med Phys; 1999 Nov; 26(11):2273-85. PubMed ID: 10587208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Monte Carlo performance on the x-ray converter thickness in digital mammography using software breast models.
Liaparinos P; Bliznakova K
Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6638-51. PubMed ID: 23127058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Signal and noise transfer properties of photoelectric interactions in diagnostic x-ray imaging detectors.
Hajdok G; Yao J; Battista JJ; Cunningham IA
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3601-20. PubMed ID: 17089826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
Boyce SJ; Samei E
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy validation of incident photon fluence on detective quantum efficiency in mammography.
Haba T; Koyama S; Otani N
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2018 Dec; 41(4):847-852. PubMed ID: 30151709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mammographic imaging with a small format CCD-based digital cassette: physical characteristics of a clinical system.
Vedantham S; Karellas A; Suryanarayanan S; Levis I; Sayag M; Kleehammer R; Heidsieck R; D'Orsi CJ
Med Phys; 2000 Aug; 27(8):1832-40. PubMed ID: 10984230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detective quantum efficiency dependence on x-ray energy weighting in mammography.
Cahn RN; Cederström B; Danielsson M; Hall A; Lundqvist M; Nygren D
Med Phys; 1999 Dec; 26(12):2680-3. PubMed ID: 10619253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cascaded systems analysis of charge sharing in cadmium telluride photon-counting x-ray detectors.
Tanguay J; Cunningham IA
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1926-1941. PubMed ID: 29526029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A spatio-temporal detective quantum efficiency and its application to fluoroscopic systems.
Friedman SN; Cunningham IA
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):6061-9. PubMed ID: 21158318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system.
Marshall NW; Lemmens K; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):811-24. PubMed ID: 22320791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of a high fill factor, indirect detection prototype flat-panel imager for mammography.
El-Mohri Y; Antonuk LE; Zhao Q; Wang Y; Li Y; Du H; Sawant A
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):315-27. PubMed ID: 17278517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Imaging performance of the hybrid pixel detectors XPAD3-S.
Brunner FC; Clemens JC; Hemmer C; Morel C
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 54(6):1773-89. PubMed ID: 19258683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physical and psychophysical characterization of a novel clinical system for digital mammography.
Rivetti S; Lanconelli N; Bertolini M; Borasi G; Golinelli P; Acchiappati D; Gallo E
Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):5139-48. PubMed ID: 19994524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector.
Zhao W; Ji WG; Debrie A; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):254-63. PubMed ID: 12607843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rapid Monte Carlo simulation of detector DQE(f).
Star-Lack J; Sun M; Meyer A; Morf D; Constantin D; Fahrig R; Abel E
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031916. PubMed ID: 24593734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
