These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19472640)

  • 21. Rapid Monte Carlo simulation of detector DQE(f).
    Star-Lack J; Sun M; Meyer A; Morf D; Constantin D; Fahrig R; Abel E
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031916. PubMed ID: 24593734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fundamental x-ray interaction limits in diagnostic imaging detectors: frequency-dependent Swank noise.
    Hajdok G; Battista JJ; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7):3194-204. PubMed ID: 18697544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Thick, segmented CdWO4-photodiode detector for cone beam megavoltage CT: a Monte Carlo study of system design parameters.
    Monajemi TT; Fallone BG; Rathee S
    Med Phys; 2006 Dec; 33(12):4567-77. PubMed ID: 17278808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cascaded systems analysis of a-Se/a-Si and a-InGaZnO TFT passive and active pixel sensors for tomosynthesis.
    Sengupta A; Zhao C; Konstantinidis A; Kanicki J
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(2):025012. PubMed ID: 30523916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Characterization of photon-counting multislit breast tomosynthesis.
    Berggren K; Cederström B; Lundqvist M; Fredenberg E
    Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):549-560. PubMed ID: 29159881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Technical Note: Impact on detective quantum efficiency of edge angle determination method by International Electrotechnical Commission methodology for cardiac x-ray image detectors.
    Gislason-Lee AJ; Tunstall CM; Kengyelics SK; Cowen AR; Davies AG
    Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4423-7. PubMed ID: 26233172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The detective quantum efficiency of photon-counting x-ray detectors using cascaded-systems analyses.
    Tanguay J; Yun S; Kim HK; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041913. PubMed ID: 23556907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. System performance of a prototype flat-panel imager operated under mammographic conditions.
    Jee KW; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Zhao Q
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1874-90. PubMed ID: 12906206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Analysis of the kinestatic charge detection system as a high detective quantum efficiency electronic portal imaging device.
    Samant SS; Gopal A
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3557-67. PubMed ID: 17022252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Physical characterization and performance comparison of active- and passive-pixel CMOS detectors for mammography.
    Elbakri IA; McIntosh BJ; Rickey DW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 54(6):1743-55. PubMed ID: 19242050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Modeling the frequency-dependent detective quantum efficiency of photon-counting x-ray detectors.
    Stierstorfer K
    Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):156-166. PubMed ID: 29131361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The detective quantum efficiency of cadmium telluride photon-counting x-ray detectors in breast imaging applications.
    Day JA; Tanguay J
    Med Phys; 2022 Mar; 49(3):1481-1494. PubMed ID: 34905627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An investigation of the imaging characteristics of the Y2O2S:Eu3+ phosphor for application in X-ray detectors of digital mammography.
    Cavouras D; Kandarakis I; Panayiotakis GS; Kanellopoulos E; Triantis D; Nomicos CD
    Appl Radiat Isot; 1998 Aug; 49(8):931-7. PubMed ID: 9650263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography x-ray systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(18):5545-68. PubMed ID: 17804881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Physical characterization of a high-resolution CCD detector for mammography.
    Elbakri IA; Tesic MM; Xiong Q
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2171-83. PubMed ID: 17404462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: theoretical analysis of detective quantum efficiency.
    Zhao W; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 1997 Dec; 24(12):1819-33. PubMed ID: 9434965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Physical characteristics of five clinical systems for digital mammography.
    Lazzari B; Belli G; Gori C; Rosselli Del Turco M
    Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2730-43. PubMed ID: 17821981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Study of a prototype high quantum efficiency thick scintillation crystal video-electronic portal imaging device.
    Samant SS; Gopal A
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2783-91. PubMed ID: 16964854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part I. Technical characterization of the systems.
    Marshall NW; Monnin P; Bosmans H; Bochud FO; Verdun FR
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul; 56(14):4201-20. PubMed ID: 21701051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cascaded systems analysis of photon counting detectors.
    Xu J; Zbijewski W; Gang G; Stayman JW; Taguchi K; Lundqvist M; Fredenberg E; Carrino JA; Siewerdsen JH
    Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):101907. PubMed ID: 25281959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.