These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19472640)

  • 61. Photon-counting hexagonal pixel array CdTe detector: Spatial resolution characteristics for image-guided interventional applications.
    Vedantham S; Shrestha S; Karellas A; Shi L; Gounis MJ; Bellazzini R; Spandre G; Brez A; Minuti M
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2118. PubMed ID: 27147324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. A slot-scanned photodiode-array/CCD hybrid detector for digital mammography.
    Mainprize JG; Ford NL; Yin S; Tümer T; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2002 Feb; 29(2):214-25. PubMed ID: 11865992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Signal, noise power spectrum, and detective quantum efficiency of indirect-detection flat-panel imagers for diagnostic radiology.
    Siewerdsen JH; Antonuk LE; el-Mohri Y; Yorkston J; Huang W; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 1998 May; 25(5):614-28. PubMed ID: 9608470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Performance of a 41 x 41 cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector designed for angiographic and R&F imaging applications.
    Granfors PR; Aufrichtig R; Possin GE; Giambattista BW; Huang ZS; Liu J; Ma B
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2715-26. PubMed ID: 14596310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Quantitative image quality measurements of a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
    Olgar T; Kahn T; Gosch D
    Rofo; 2013 Dec; 185(12):1188-94. PubMed ID: 23888475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. 50 μm pixel pitch wafer-scale CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray detector for digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Zhao C; Konstantinidis AC; Zheng Y; Anaxagoras T; Speller RD; Kanicki J
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Dec; 60(23):8977-9001. PubMed ID: 26540090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Empirical electro-optical and x-ray performance evaluation of CMOS active pixels sensor for low dose, high resolution x-ray medical imaging.
    Arvanitis CD; Bohndiek SE; Royle G; Blue A; Liang HX; Clark A; Prydderch M; Turchetta R; Speller R
    Med Phys; 2007 Dec; 34(12):4612-25. PubMed ID: 18196789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. An experimental framework for assessing the detective quantum efficiency of spectroscopic x-ray detectors.
    Zarif Yussefian N; Tanguay J
    Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1318-1335. PubMed ID: 36479933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Measurements of the modulation transfer function, normalized noise power spectrum and detective quantum efficiency for two flat panel detectors: a fluoroscopic and a cone beam computer tomography flat panel detectors.
    Benítez RB; Ning R; Conover D; Liu S
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2009; 17(4):279-93. PubMed ID: 19923685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Retrospective analysis of a detector fault for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5655-73. PubMed ID: 17047276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Signal and noise transfer properties of CMOS based active pixel flat panel imager coupled to structured CsI:Tl.
    Arvanitis CD; Bohndiek SE; Blakesley J; Olivo A; Speller RD
    Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):116-26. PubMed ID: 19235380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Overestimations in zero frequency DQE of x-ray imaging converters assessed by Monte Carlo techniques based on the study of energy impartation events.
    Liaparinos PF; Kandarakis IS
    Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4440-50. PubMed ID: 21859045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. A detective quantum efficiency for spectroscopic X-ray imaging detectors.
    Tanguay J; Richtsmeier D; Dydula C; Day JA; Iniewski K; Bazalova-Carter M
    Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 48(11):6781-6799. PubMed ID: 34460950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Technical Note: Detective quantum efficiency simulation of a-Se imaging detectors using ARTEMIS.
    Fang Y; Ito T; Nariyuki F; Kuwabara T; Badano A; Karim KS
    Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4035-4039. PubMed ID: 28569992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Image simulation and a model of noise power spectra across a range of mammographic beam qualities.
    Mackenzie A; Dance DR; Diaz O; Young KC
    Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121901. PubMed ID: 25471961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Conversion of mammographic images to appear with the noise and sharpness characteristics of a different detector and x-ray system.
    Mackenzie A; Dance DR; Workman A; Yip M; Wells K; Young KC
    Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2721-34. PubMed ID: 22559643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Characterization of noise sources for two generations of computed radiography systems using powder and crystalline photostimulable phosphors.
    Mackenzie A; Honey ID
    Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3345-57. PubMed ID: 17879798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Signal-to-noise properties of mammographic film-screen systems.
    Nishikawa RM; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 3974523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Energy, angular and spatial distributions of primary electrons inside photoconducting materials for digital mammography: Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Sakellaris T; Spyrou G; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 52(21):6439-60. PubMed ID: 17951854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Technical Note: Comparison of first- and second-generation photon-counting slit-scanning tomosynthesis systems.
    Berggren K; Cederström B; Lundqvist M; Fredenberg E
    Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):635-638. PubMed ID: 29265414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.