212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19472647)
1. Comparison of two commercial whole body PET systems based on LSO and BGO crystals respectively for brain imaging.
Trébossen R; Comtat C; Brulon V; Bailly P; Meyer ME
Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1399-409. PubMed ID: 19472647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A practical way to improve contrast-to-noise ratio and quantitation for statistical-based iterative reconstruction in whole-body PET imaging.
Fin L; Bailly P; Daouk J; Meyer ME
Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3072-9. PubMed ID: 19673206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. (90)Y -PET imaging: Exploring limitations and accuracy under conditions of low counts and high random fraction.
Carlier T; Willowson KP; Fourkal E; Bailey DL; Doss M; Conti M
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4295-309. PubMed ID: 26133627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of dedicated breast positron emission tomography and whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography images: a common phantom study.
Satoh Y; Motosugi U; Imai M; Onishi H
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Feb; 34(2):119-127. PubMed ID: 31768819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spatial resolution and image qualities of Zr-89 on Siemens Biograph TruePoint PET/CT.
Lee YS; Kim JS; Kim JY; Kim BI; Lim SM; Kim HJ
Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2015 Feb; 30(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 25549151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of target-to-background ratio, target size, emission scan duration, and activity on physical figures of merit for a 3D LSO-based whole body PET/CT scanner.
Brambilla M; Matheoud R; Secco C; Sacchetti G; Comi S; Rudoni M; Carriero A; Inglese E
Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3854-65. PubMed ID: 17985631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Physical performance of the new hybrid PET∕CT Discovery-690.
Bettinardi V; Presotto L; Rapisarda E; Picchio M; Gianolli L; Gilardi MC
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5394-411. PubMed ID: 21992359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The edge artifact in the point-spread function-based PET reconstruction at different sphere-to-background ratios of radioactivity.
Kidera D; Kihara K; Akamatsu G; Mikasa S; Taniguchi T; Tsutsui Y; Takeshita T; Maebatake A; Miwa K; Sasaki M
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Feb; 30(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 26531181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. PET based volume segmentation with emphasis on the iterative TrueX algorithm.
Knäusl B; Hirtl A; Dobrozemsky G; Bergmann H; Kletter K; Dudczak R; Georg D
Z Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 22(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 21251804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of fluorine-18 and bromine-76 imaging in positron emission tomography.
Ribeiro MJ; Almeida P; Strul D; Ferreira N; Loc'h C; Brulon V; Trébossen R; Mazière B; Bendriem B
Eur J Nucl Med; 1999 Jul; 26(7):758-66. PubMed ID: 10398824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multisphere phantom and analysis algorithm for PET image quality assessment.
Wilson JM; Turkington TG
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jun; 53(12):3267-78. PubMed ID: 18506071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Repeatability of
Pfaehler E; Beukinga RJ; de Jong JR; Slart RHJA; Slump CH; Dierckx RAJO; Boellaard R
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):665-678. PubMed ID: 30506687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Time-of-Flight Information Improved the Detectability of Subcentimeter Spheres Using a Clinical PET/CT Scanner.
Hashimoto N; Morita K; Tsutsui Y; Himuro K; Baba S; Sasaki M
J Nucl Med Technol; 2018 Sep; 46(3):268-273. PubMed ID: 29599404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of Statistical Fluctuation on Reproducibility and Accuracy of SUVmax and SUVpeak: A Phantom Study.
Akamatsu G; Ikari Y; Nishida H; Nishio T; Ohnishi A; Maebatake A; Sasaki M; Senda M
J Nucl Med Technol; 2015 Sep; 43(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 26271802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Scanning rats on the high resolution research tomograph (HRRT): a comparison study with a dedicated micro-PET.
Blinder SA; Dinelle K; Sossi V
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5073-83. PubMed ID: 22894433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of Ge-68/Ga-68-based versus CT-based attenuation correction on PET.
van Dalen JA; Visser EP; Vogel WV; Corstens FH; Oyen WJ
Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):889-97. PubMed ID: 17441234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Static and moving phantom studies for radiation treatment planning in a positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) system.
Okubo M; Nishimura Y; Nakamatsu K; Okumura M; Shibata T; Kanamori S; Hanaoka K; Hosono M
Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Aug; 22(7):579-86. PubMed ID: 18756360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance evaluation of a high resolution dedicated breast PET scanner.
García Hernández T; Vicedo González A; Ferrer Rebolleda J; Sánchez Jurado R; Roselló Ferrando J; Brualla González L; Granero Cabañero D; Del Puig Cozar Santiago M
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2261. PubMed ID: 27147338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Beyond 18F-FDG: Characterization of PET/CT and PET/MR Scanners for a Comprehensive Set of Positron Emitters of Growing Application--18F, 11C, 89Zr, 124I, 68Ga, and 90Y.
Soderlund AT; Chaal J; Tjio G; Totman JJ; Conti M; Townsend DW
J Nucl Med; 2015 Aug; 56(8):1285-91. PubMed ID: 26135111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving the detection of small lesions using a state-of-the-art time-of-flight PET/CT system and small-voxel reconstructions.
Koopman D; van Dalen JA; Lagerweij MC; Arkies H; de Boer J; Oostdijk AH; Slump CH; Jager PL
J Nucl Med Technol; 2015 Mar; 43(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 25613334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
