These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19472963)

  • 1. Cement oscillation increases interlock strength at the cement-bone interface, with commentary.
    Wang Y; Han P; Gu W; Shi Z; Li D; Wang C
    Orthopedics; 2009 May; 32(5):325; discussion 325. PubMed ID: 19472963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Study on the effect of bone-cement interface with bone cement oscillator].
    Wang Y; Yan F; Song DC; Qu YL; Yang GF; Shi ZW; Gu WG; Song YB; Li DB; Wang CL
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Mar; 46(6):431-3. PubMed ID: 18785577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Application of an amphiphilic bonder in a goat model to increase the femoral cement-bone adhesion in cemented hip arthroplasty].
    Müller-Rath R; Wirtz D; Andereya S; Gravius S; Hermanns-Sachweh B; Marx R; Mumme T
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2007; 145(4):476-82. PubMed ID: 17912668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of 2 modern femoral cementing techniques: analysis by cement-bone interface pressure measurements, computerized image analysis, and static mechanical testing.
    Reading AD; McCaskie AW; Barnes MR; Gregg PJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):479-87. PubMed ID: 10884209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improvement of the long-term adhesive strength between bone cement and bone in cemented cup arthroplasty: ex-vivo study.
    Mumme T; Gravius S; Andereya S; Marx R; Wirtz DC; Müller-Rath R
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2007 Aug; 127(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 17492454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reduction in cement-bone interface shear strength between primary and revision arthroplasty.
    Dohmae Y; Bechtold JE; Sherman RE; Puno RM; Gustilo RB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Nov; (236):214-20. PubMed ID: 3180573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mixed-mode failure response of the cement-bone interface.
    Mann KA; Mocarski R; Damron LA; Allen MJ; Ayers DC
    J Orthop Res; 2001 Nov; 19(6):1153-61. PubMed ID: 11781018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Precooling of the femoral canal enhances shear strength at the cement-prosthesis interface and reduces the polymerization temperature.
    Hsieh PH; Tai CL; Chang YH; Lee MS; Shih HN; Shih CH
    J Orthop Res; 2006 Sep; 24(9):1809-14. PubMed ID: 16865715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanical aspects of degree of cement bonding and implant wedge effect.
    Yoon YS; Oxland TR; Hodgson AJ; Duncan CP; Masri BA; Choi D
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Nov; 23(9):1141-7. PubMed ID: 18584929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surface coating to improve the metal-cement bonding in cemented femur stems.
    Mumme T; Marx R; Müller-Rath R; Siebert CH; Wirtz DC
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Aug; 128(8):773-81. PubMed ID: 17909822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of femoral stem surface finish on the apparent static shear strength at the stem-cement interface.
    Zhang H; Brown LT; Blunt LA; Barrans SM
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2008 Jan; 1(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 19627775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cement fixation of the femoral component in older patients.
    Lachiewicz PF
    Instr Course Lect; 2008; 57():261-5. PubMed ID: 18399589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurement of transient and residual stresses during polymerization of bone cement for cemented hip implants.
    Nuño N; Madrala A; Plamondon D
    J Biomech; 2008 Aug; 41(12):2605-11. PubMed ID: 18692188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Strength of the cement-bone interface.
    Krause WR; Krug W; Miller J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1982 Mar; (163):290-9. PubMed ID: 7067264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Creep dominates tensile fatigue damage of the cement-bone interface.
    Kim DG; Miller MA; Mann KA
    J Orthop Res; 2004 May; 22(3):633-40. PubMed ID: 15099645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Penetration and shear strength of cement-bone interfaces in vivo.
    MacDonald W; Swarts E; Beaver R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Jan; (286):283-8. PubMed ID: 8425359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro interface and cement mantle analysis of different femur stem designs.
    Gravius S; Wirtz DC; Siebert CH; Andereya S; Mueller-Rath R; Maus U; Mumme T
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(9):2021-8. PubMed ID: 18514207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reaming versus broaching in cemented hip arthroplasty: mechanical stability in cadaver femora.
    Ioannidis TT; Apostolou CD; Korres DS; Papaletsos I; Gandaifis ND; Panagopoulos CN; Agathocleous PE
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Jun; 76(3):326-30. PubMed ID: 16156458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanical characteristics of the bone-graft-cement interface after impaction allografting.
    Frei H; Mitchell P; Masri BA; Duncan CP; Oxland TR
    J Orthop Res; 2005 Jan; 23(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 15607869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cement mantle retention: filling the hole.
    Cross M; Bostrom M
    Orthopedics; 2009 Sep; 32(9):. PubMed ID: 19751012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.