These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Uncertainty estimation of pathlines in ground water models. Stauffer F Ground Water; 2005; 43(6):843-9. PubMed ID: 16324006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A stochastic optimization model under modeling uncertainty and parameter certainty for groundwater remediation design--part I. Model development. He L; Huang GH; Lu HW J Hazard Mater; 2010 Apr; 176(1-3):521-6. PubMed ID: 20006432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost optimization of DNAPL source and plume remediation under uncertainty using a semi-analytic model. Cardiff M; Liu X; Kitanidis PK; Parker J; Kim U J Contam Hydrol; 2010 Apr; 113(1-4):25-43. PubMed ID: 20185203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A coupled simulation-optimization approach for groundwater remediation design under uncertainty: an application to a petroleum-contaminated site. He L; Huang GH; Lu HW Environ Pollut; 2009; 157(8-9):2485-92. PubMed ID: 19359077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pulsed pumping process optimization using a potential flow model. Tenney CM; Lastoskie CM J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Aug; 93(1-4):111-21. PubMed ID: 17350717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of the value of reducing uncertainty by sampling in a groundwater remediation system. Ma HW; Chang CC Sci Total Environ; 2008 Aug; 402(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 18539311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A stochastic optimization model under modeling uncertainty and parameter certainty for groundwater remediation design: part II. Model application. He L; Huang GH; Lu HW J Hazard Mater; 2010 Apr; 176(1-3):527-34. PubMed ID: 20006433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conventional and combined pump-and-treat systems under nonuniform background flow. Bayer P; Finkel M Ground Water; 2006; 44(2):234-43. PubMed ID: 16556205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simulation-based process optimization for surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation at heterogeneous DNAPL-contaminated sites. Qin XS; Huang GH; Chakma A; Chen B; Zeng GM Sci Total Environ; 2007 Aug; 381(1-3):17-37. PubMed ID: 17509664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Probabilistic study of well capture zones distribution at the Lauswiesen field site. Riva M; Guadagnini L; Guadagnini A; Ptak T; Martac E J Contam Hydrol; 2006 Nov; 88(1-2):92-118. PubMed ID: 16904791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimizing remediation of an unconfined aquifer using a hybrid algorithm. Hsiao CT; Chang LC Ground Water; 2005; 43(6):904-15. PubMed ID: 16324011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Latin hypercube approach to estimate uncertainty in ground water vulnerability. Gurdak JJ; McCray JE; Thyne G; Qi SL Ground Water; 2007; 45(3):348-61. PubMed ID: 17470124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An integrated simulation, inference, and optimization method for identifying groundwater remediation strategies at petroleum-contaminated aquifers in western Canada. He L; Huang GH; Zeng GM; Lu HW Water Res; 2008 May; 42(10-11):2629-39. PubMed ID: 18308365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Forensic isotope analysis to refine a hydrologic conceptual model. Bassett RL; Steinwand A; Jorat S; Petersen C; Jackson R Ground Water; 2008; 46(3):372-83. PubMed ID: 18266731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An investigation of numerical grid effects in parameter estimation. Zyvoloski GA; Vesselinov VV Ground Water; 2006; 44(6):814-25. PubMed ID: 17087753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A multi-objective optimization framework for surfactant-enhanced remediation of DNAPL contaminations. Schaerlaekens J; Mertens J; Van Linden J; Vermeiren G; Carmeliet J; Feyen J J Contam Hydrol; 2006 Aug; 86(3-4):176-94. PubMed ID: 16600420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]