BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19473312)

  • 1. The role of similarity cues in the development of trust in sources of information about GM food.
    Meijnders A; Midden C; Olofsson A; Ohman S; Matthes J; Bondarenko O; Gutteling J; Rusanen M
    Risk Anal; 2009 Aug; 29(8):1116-28. PubMed ID: 19473312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trust, the asymmetry principle, and the role of prior beliefs.
    Poortinga W; Pidgeon NF
    Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1475-86. PubMed ID: 15660605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Who does the public trust? The case of genetically modified food in the United States.
    Lang JT; Hallman WK
    Risk Anal; 2005 Oct; 25(5):1241-52. PubMed ID: 16297228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trust, confidence, procedural fairness, outcome fairness, moral conviction, and the acceptance of GM field experiments.
    Siegrist M; Connor M; Keller C
    Risk Anal; 2012 Aug; 32(8):1394-403. PubMed ID: 22150405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An empirical test of competing theories of hazard-related trust: the case of GM food.
    Allum N
    Risk Anal; 2007 Aug; 27(4):935-46. PubMed ID: 17958502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consumer acceptance of biotechnology and the role of second generation technologies in the USA and Europe.
    Lusk JL; Rozan A
    Trends Biotechnol; 2005 Aug; 23(8):386-7. PubMed ID: 15953650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trust in risk regulation: cause or consequence of the acceptability of GM food?
    Poortinga W; Pidgeon NF
    Risk Anal; 2005 Feb; 25(1):199-209. PubMed ID: 15787769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. GM foods and the misperception of risk perception.
    Gaskell G; Allum N; Wagner W; Kronberger N; Torgersen H; Hampel J; Bardes J
    Risk Anal; 2004 Feb; 24(1):185-94. PubMed ID: 15028010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New Zealand backs GM technologies.
    Norrie C
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Sep; 19(9):792. PubMed ID: 11533620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How can genetically modified foods be made publicly acceptable?
    Rowe G
    Trends Biotechnol; 2004 Mar; 22(3):107-9. PubMed ID: 15043045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The future of transgenic plants in developing countries.
    Weil A
    Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand); 2001 Dec; 47(8):1343-51. PubMed ID: 11838954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetically modified organisms in the United States: implementation, concerns, and public perception.
    Oeschger MP; Silva CE
    Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 107():57-68. PubMed ID: 17522820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Science, politics, and the GM debate in Europe.
    Tencalla F
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Feb; 44(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 16188360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chinese public understanding of the use of agricultural biotechnology--a case study from Zhejiang Province of China.
    Lü L
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2006 Apr; 7(4):257-66. PubMed ID: 16532526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The public perception of information about the potential risks of genetically modified crops in the food chain].
    Furnival AC; Pinheiro SM
    Hist Cienc Saude Manguinhos; 2008; 15(2):277-91. PubMed ID: 19397023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reactions to genetically modified food crops and how perception of risks and benefits influences consumers' information gathering.
    Wilson C; Evans G; Leppard P; Syrette J
    Risk Anal; 2004 Oct; 24(5):1311-21. PubMed ID: 15563297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Views of health journalists, industry employees and news consumers about disclosure and regulation of industry-journalist relationships: an empirical ethical study.
    Lipworth W; Kerridge I; Morrell B; Forsyth R; Jordens CF
    J Med Ethics; 2015 Mar; 41(3):252-7. PubMed ID: 24603036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attitudes to genetically modified food over time: How trust in organizations and the media cycle predict support.
    Marques MD; Critchley CR; Walshe J
    Public Underst Sci; 2015 Jul; 24(5):601-18. PubMed ID: 25063421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attitudes of agricultural scientists in Indonesia towards genetically modified foods.
    Februhartanty J; Widyastuti TN; Iswarawanti DN
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2007; 16(2):375-80. PubMed ID: 17468097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Co-existence of agricultural production systems.
    Jank B; Rath J; Gaugitsch H
    Trends Biotechnol; 2006 May; 24(5):198-200. PubMed ID: 16545877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.