These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The role of migration in the evolution of phenotypic switching. Carja O; Furrow RE; Feldman MW Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Nov; 281(1794):20141677. PubMed ID: 25232136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The evolution of phenotypic switching in subdivided populations. Carja O; Liberman U; Feldman MW Genetics; 2014 Apr; 196(4):1185-97. PubMed ID: 24496012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exclusion rules, bottlenecks and the evolution of stochastic phenotype switching. Libby E; Rainey PB Proc Biol Sci; 2011 Dec; 278(1724):3574-83. PubMed ID: 21490013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The evolutionary emergence of stochastic phenotype switching in bacteria. Rainey PB; Beaumont HJ; Ferguson GC; Gallie J; Kost C; Libby E; Zhang XX Microb Cell Fact; 2011 Aug; 10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S14. PubMed ID: 21995592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Emergence of phenotype switching through continuous and discontinuous evolutionary transitions. Patra P; Klumpp S Phys Biol; 2015 May; 12(4):046004. PubMed ID: 26020274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Phenotype switching and mutations in random environments. Fudenberg D; Imhof LA Bull Math Biol; 2012 Feb; 74(2):399-421. PubMed ID: 21901527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Deterministic and stochastic regimes of asexual evolution on rugged fitness landscapes. Jain K; Krug J Genetics; 2007 Mar; 175(3):1275-88. PubMed ID: 17179085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimal phenotypic adaptation in fluctuating environments. George JT Biophys J; 2023 Nov; 122(22):4414-4424. PubMed ID: 37876159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The concept of fitness in fluctuating environments. Sæther BE; Engen S Trends Ecol Evol; 2015 May; 30(5):273-81. PubMed ID: 25843273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimality and adaptation of phenotypically switching cells in fluctuating environments. Belete MK; Balázsi G Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2015 Dec; 92(6):062716. PubMed ID: 26764736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Guided evolution of in silico microbial populations in complex environments accelerates evolutionary rates through a step-wise adaptation. Mozhayskiy V; Tagkopoulos I BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Jun; 13 Suppl 10(Suppl 10):S10. PubMed ID: 22759415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bet hedging or not? A guide to proper classification of microbial survival strategies. de Jong IG; Haccou P; Kuipers OP Bioessays; 2011 Mar; 33(3):215-23. PubMed ID: 21254151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Overdominance interacts with linkage to determine the rate of adaptation to a new optimum. Draghi J; Whitlock MC J Evol Biol; 2015 Jan; 28(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 25393682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The benefits of maternal effects in novel and in stable environments. Hoyle RB; Ezard TH J R Soc Interface; 2012 Oct; 9(75):2403-13. PubMed ID: 22572028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evolutionary bet-hedging in the real world: empirical evidence and challenges revealed by plants. Childs DZ; Metcalf CJ; Rees M Proc Biol Sci; 2010 Oct; 277(1697):3055-64. PubMed ID: 20573624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Natural selection fails to optimize mutation rates for long-term adaptation on rugged fitness landscapes. Clune J; Misevic D; Ofria C; Lenski RE; Elena SF; Sanjuán R PLoS Comput Biol; 2008 Sep; 4(9):e1000187. PubMed ID: 18818724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]