These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1947511)

  • 1. A one degree of freedom nominal association model for testing independence in two-way contingency tables.
    Davis CS
    Stat Med; 1991 Oct; 10(10):1555-63. PubMed ID: 1947511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The score test for independence in R x C contingency tables with missing data.
    Lipsitz SR; Fitzmaurice GM
    Biometrics; 1996 Jun; 52(2):751-62. PubMed ID: 8672711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Power comparison of two-sided exact tests for association in 2 x 2 contingency tables using standard, mid p and randomized test versions.
    Lydersen S; Laake P
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3859-71. PubMed ID: 14673943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A revisit to contingency table and tests of independence: bootstrap is preferred to Chi-square approximations as well as Fisher's exact test.
    Lin JJ; Chang CH; Pal N
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(3):438-58. PubMed ID: 24905809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testing for independence in J×K contingency tables with complex sample survey data.
    Lipsitz SR; Fitzmaurice GM; Sinha D; Hevelone N; Giovannucci E; Hu JC
    Biometrics; 2015 Sep; 71(3):832-40. PubMed ID: 25762089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computation of the quasi-independence model for the analysis of triangular contingency tables.
    Aktaş S
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Jan; 89(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 18037188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiway contingency tables: Monte Carlo resampling probability values for the chi-squared and likelihood-ratio tests.
    Long MA; Berry KJ; Mielke PW
    Psychol Rep; 2010 Oct; 107(2):501-10. PubMed ID: 21117477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A discussion on significance indices for contingency tables under small sample sizes.
    Oliveira NL; Pereira CAB; Diniz MA; Polpo A
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0199102. PubMed ID: 30071022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Chi 2 tests: how useful are they in the analysis of medical research data?
    Osborn JF
    Ann Ig; 1989; 1(3-4):417-32. PubMed ID: 2483622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The analysis of 2 x 1 and 2 x 2 contingency tables: an historical review.
    Richardson JT
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1994; 3(2):107-33. PubMed ID: 7952428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Generalizing Terwilliger's likelihood approach: a new score statistic to test for genetic association.
    el Galta R; Uitte de Willige S; de Visser MC; Helmer Q; Hsu L; Houwing-Duistermaat JJ
    BMC Genet; 2007 Sep; 8():63. PubMed ID: 17892585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Canonical correlation and chi-square: relationships and interpretation.
    Dunlap WP; Brody CJ; Greer T
    J Gen Psychol; 2000 Oct; 127(4):341-53. PubMed ID: 11109997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Issues in biomedical statistics: analysing 2 x 2 tables of frequencies.
    Ludbrook J; Dudley H
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1994 Nov; 64(11):780-7. PubMed ID: 7945088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Likelihood ratio testing of variance components in the linear mixed-effects model using restricted maximum likelihood.
    Morrell CH
    Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1560-8. PubMed ID: 9883552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A simple test of association for contingency tables with multiple column responses.
    Decady YJ; Thomas DR
    Biometrics; 2000 Sep; 56(3):893-6. PubMed ID: 10985233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of residuals in contingency tables: another nail in the coffin of conditional approaches to significance testing.
    García-Pérez MA; Núñez-Antón V; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Mar; 47(1):147-61. PubMed ID: 24788323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exact and asymptotic tests for homogeneity in several 2 x 2 tables.
    Reis IM; Hirji KF; Afifi AA
    Stat Med; 1999 Apr; 18(8):893-906. PubMed ID: 10363329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of diagnostic classification item response models.
    Hansen M; Cai L; Monroe S; Li Z
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):225-252. PubMed ID: 27404336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new statistic for the analysis of association between trait and polymorphic marker loci.
    Choulakian V; Mahdi S
    Math Biosci; 2000 Apr; 164(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 10748283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing for genetic association: a powerful score test.
    El Galta R; Stijnen T; Houwing-Duistermaat JJ
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4596-609. PubMed ID: 18551534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.