These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19475538)

  • 1. Empirical vs natural weighting in random effects meta-analysis.
    Shuster JJ
    Stat Med; 2010 May; 29(12):1259-65. PubMed ID: 19475538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comments on 'Empirical vs natural weighting in random effects meta-analysis'.
    Waksman JA
    Stat Med; 2010 May; 29(12):1268-9; discussion 1272-81. PubMed ID: 20499330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comments on 'Empirical vs natural weighting in random effects meta-analysis'.
    Laird N; Fitzmaurice G; Ding X
    Stat Med; 2010 May; 29(12):1266-7; discussion 1272-81. PubMed ID: 20499329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: a systematic review.
    Filges T; Sonne-Schmidt CS; Nielsen BCV
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2018; 14(1):1-107. PubMed ID: 37131395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Likelihood-based random-effects meta-analysis with few studies: empirical and simulation studies.
    Seide SE; Röver C; Friede T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):16. PubMed ID: 30634920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correction for bias in meta-analysis of little-replicated studies.
    Doncaster CP; Spake R
    Methods Ecol Evol; 2018 Mar; 9(3):634-644. PubMed ID: 29938012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bias and precision of methods for estimating the difference in restricted mean survival time from an individual patient data meta-analysis.
    Lueza B; Rotolo F; Bonastre J; Pignon JP; Michiels S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Mar; 16():37. PubMed ID: 27025706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Voluntary work for the physical and mental health of older volunteers: A systematic review.
    Filges T; Siren A; Fridberg T; Nielsen BCV
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2020 Dec; 16(4):e1124. PubMed ID: 37016617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Classical and Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis models with sample quality weights in gene expression studies.
    Siangphoe U; Archer KJ; Mukhopadhyay ND
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Jan; 20(1):18. PubMed ID: 30626315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comments on 'Empirical vs natural weighting in random effects meta-analysis'.
    Thompson SG; Higgins JP
    Stat Med; 2010 May; 29(12):1270-1; discussion 1272-81. PubMed ID: 20499331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comments on 'Empirical vs natural weighting in random effects meta-analysis' by JJ Shuster, Statistics in Medicine 2009; 26, Published online, DOI: 10.1002/sim.3607.
    Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Carpenter J; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(28):2963-5; author reply 2965-6. PubMed ID: 21104939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Meta-analysis of the efficacy of a single dose of phenylephrine 10 mg compared with placebo in adults with acute nasal congestion due to the common cold.
    Kollar C; Schneider H; Waksman J; Krusinska E
    Clin Ther; 2007 Jun; 29(6):1057-70. PubMed ID: 17692721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Meta-analysis of studies with missing data.
    Yuan Y; Little RJ
    Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):487-96. PubMed ID: 18565168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bias, coverage, and asymptotic behaviour of random effects meta-analysis: a clinically driven simulation study.
    Johnson K; Hayen A; Lassere MND; Mengersen K
    JBI Evid Implement; 2020 Dec; 18(4):355-367. PubMed ID: 33570319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incorporating variability in estimates of heterogeneity in the random effects model in meta-analysis.
    Biggerstaff BJ; Tweedie RL
    Stat Med; 1997 Apr; 16(7):753-68. PubMed ID: 9131763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bias caused by sampling error in meta-analysis with small sample sizes.
    Lin L
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204056. PubMed ID: 30212588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.
    Deckert A; Anders S; de Allegri M; Nguyen HT; Souares A; McMahon S; Boerner K; Meurer M; Herbst K; Sand M; Koeppel L; Siems T; Brugnara L; Brenner S; Burk R; Lou D; Kirrmaier D; Duan Y; Ovchinnikova S; Marx M; Kräusslich HG; Knop M; Bärnighausen T; Denkinger C
    Trials; 2021 Jan; 22(1):39. PubMed ID: 33419461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.