These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19476241)

  • 1. Statistical inference involving binomial and negative binomial parameters.
    García-Pérez MA; Núñez-Antón V
    Span J Psychol; 2009 May; 12(1):288-307. PubMed ID: 19476241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of multinomial and binomial proportion methods for analysis of multinomial count data.
    Galyean ML; Wester DB
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Oct; 88(10):3452-63. PubMed ID: 20601524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On tests of rate ratio under standard inverse sampling.
    Tang ML; Liao YJ; Ng HK
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Mar; 89(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 18164512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy in parameter estimation for targeted effects in structural equation modeling: sample size planning for narrow confidence intervals.
    Lai K; Kelley K
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Jun; 16(2):127-48. PubMed ID: 21417531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simulation-based P values: response to North et al.
    Broman KW; Caffo BS
    Am J Hum Genet; 2003 Feb; 72(2):496. PubMed ID: 12596792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Large sample tests for simultaneous comparison to multiple controls in terms of binomial proportions.
    Soulakova JN; Luo L
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013 May; 23(3):589-603. PubMed ID: 23611197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of hypoglycemic events using negative binomial models.
    Luo J; Qu Y
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 23776062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sample size calculation for clinical trials with correlated count measurements based on the negative binomial distribution.
    Li D; Zhang S; Cao J
    Stat Med; 2019 Dec; 38(28):5413-5427. PubMed ID: 31652010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reducing Monte Carlo error in the Bayesian estimation of risk ratios using log-binomial regression models.
    Salmerón D; Cano JA; Chirlaque MD
    Stat Med; 2015 Aug; 34(19):2755-67. PubMed ID: 25944082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gauss or Bernoulli? A Monte Carlo comparison of the performance of the linear mixed-model and the logistic mixed-model analyses in simulated community trials with a dichotomous outcome variable at the individual level.
    Hannan PJ; Murray DM
    Eval Rev; 1996 Jun; 20(3):338-52. PubMed ID: 10182208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Probabilistic analysis of cost-effectiveness models: statistical representation of parameter uncertainty.
    Briggs A
    Value Health; 2005; 8(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 15841888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample size under inverse negative binomial group testing for accuracy in parameter estimation.
    Montesinos-López OA; Montesinos-López A; Crossa J; Eskridge K
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e32250. PubMed ID: 22457714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical inference on categorical variables.
    Perkins SM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 404():73-88. PubMed ID: 18450046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Independence estimating equations for controlled clinical trials with small sample sizes--interval estimation.
    Dahmen G; Ziegler A
    Methods Inf Med; 2006; 45(4):430-4. PubMed ID: 16964361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robust inference in the negative binomial regression model with an application to falls data.
    Aeberhard WH; Cantoni E; Heritier S
    Biometrics; 2014 Dec; 70(4):920-31. PubMed ID: 25156188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sample size calculations for a split-cluster, beta-binomial design in the assessment of toxicity.
    Hendriks JC; Teerenstra S; Punt-Van der Zalm JP; Wetzels AM; Westphal JR; Borm GF
    Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(24):3757-72. PubMed ID: 16320284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The conditional binomial test revisited for clinical trials.
    Lei X; Davis D; Kuan L; Lee J; Oh S
    J Biopharm Stat; 1998 Nov; 8(4):533-43. PubMed ID: 9855032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Blinded sample size reestimation with negative binomial counts in superiority and non-inferiority trials.
    Friede T; Schmidli H
    Methods Inf Med; 2010; 49(6):618-24. PubMed ID: 20686735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using Lancaster's mid-P correction to the Fisher's exact test for adverse impact analyses.
    Biddle DA; Morris SB
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Sep; 96(5):956-65. PubMed ID: 21688881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How do we draw inference from "negative" studies?
    Schriger DL
    Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Jan; 41(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 12514684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.