550 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19476412)
1. Diploidy, population structure, and the evolution of recombination.
Roze D
Am Nat; 2009 Jul; 174 Suppl 1():S79-94. PubMed ID: 19476412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interference among deleterious mutations favours sex and recombination in finite populations.
Keightley PD; Otto SP
Nature; 2006 Sep; 443(7107):89-92. PubMed ID: 16957730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Deleterious mutations, variable epistatic interactions, and the evolution of recombination.
Otto SP; Feldman MW
Theor Popul Biol; 1997 Apr; 51(2):134-47. PubMed ID: 9169238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transition from haploidy to diploidy.
Perrot V; Richerd S; Valéro M
Nature; 1991 May; 351(6324):315-7. PubMed ID: 2034274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genetic measurement of theory of epistatic effects.
Wagner GP; Laubichler MD; Bagheri-Chaichian H
Genetica; 1998; 102-103(1-6):569-80. PubMed ID: 9766965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fitness epistasis among 6 biosynthetic loci in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Hall DW; Agan M; Pope SC
J Hered; 2010; 101 Suppl 1():S75-84. PubMed ID: 20194517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Epistasis between deleterious mutations and the evolution of recombination.
Kouyos RD; Silander OK; Bonhoeffer S
Trends Ecol Evol; 2007 Jun; 22(6):308-15. PubMed ID: 17337087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influences of dominance and evolution of sex in finite diploid populations.
Chang Y; Hua Y; Jiang X; Tao S
PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0128459. PubMed ID: 26011082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Deleterious mutations and selection for sex in finite diploid populations.
Roze D; Michod RE
Genetics; 2010 Apr; 184(4):1095-112. PubMed ID: 20083613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Why are sex and recombination so common?
Hadany L; Comeron JM
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008; 1133():26-43. PubMed ID: 18559814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spatial heterogeneity and the evolution of sex in diploids.
Agrawal AF
Am Nat; 2009 Jul; 174 Suppl 1():S54-70. PubMed ID: 19456268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of genetic drift on the variance/covariance components generated by multilocus additive x additive epistatic systems.
López-Fanjul C; Fernández A; Toro MA
J Theor Biol; 2006 Mar; 239(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 16242726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Self-fertilization and the evolution of recombination.
Roze D; Lenormand T
Genetics; 2005 Jun; 170(2):841-57. PubMed ID: 15781706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Why sex and recombination?
Barton NH; Charlesworth B
Science; 1998 Sep; 281(5385):1986-90. PubMed ID: 9748151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differences between selection on sex versus recombination in red queen models with diploid hosts.
Agrawal AF
Evolution; 2009 Aug; 63(8):2131-41. PubMed ID: 19453733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genetic architecture and the evolution of sex.
Lohaus R; Burch CL; Azevedo RB
J Hered; 2010; 101 Suppl 1():S142-57. PubMed ID: 20421324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perspective: Sign epistasis and genetic constraint on evolutionary trajectories.
Weinreich DM; Watson RA; Chao L
Evolution; 2005 Jun; 59(6):1165-74. PubMed ID: 16050094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modeling the evolution of genetic architecture: A continuum of alleles model with pairwise AxA epistasis.
Wagner GP; Mezey J
J Theor Biol; 2000 Mar; 203(2):163-75. PubMed ID: 10704300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fixation probabilities in evolutionary game dynamics with a two-strategy game in finite diploid populations.
Hashimoto K; Aihara K
J Theor Biol; 2009 Jun; 258(4):637-45. PubMed ID: 19233210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Haploidy or diploidy: which is better?
Kondrashov AS; Crow JF
Nature; 1991 May; 351(6324):314-5. PubMed ID: 2034273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
