BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19476634)

  • 1. Sample size calculation for microarray experiments with blocked one-way design.
    Jung SH; Sohn I; George SL; Feng L; Leppert PC
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 May; 10():164. PubMed ID: 19476634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sample size for FDR-control in microarray data analysis.
    Jung SH
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(14):3097-104. PubMed ID: 15845654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Construction of null statistics in permutation-based multiple testing for multi-factorial microarray experiments.
    Gao X
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jun; 22(12):1486-94. PubMed ID: 16574697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A weighted sample size for microarray datasets that considers the variability of variance and multiplicity.
    Kim KY; Chung HC; Rha SY
    J Biosci Bioeng; 2009 Sep; 108(3):252-8. PubMed ID: 19664562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Practical FDR-based sample size calculations in microarray experiments.
    Hu J; Zou F; Wright FA
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Aug; 21(15):3264-72. PubMed ID: 15932903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Leveraging two-way probe-level block design for identifying differential gene expression with high-density oligonucleotide arrays.
    Barrera L; Benner C; Tao YC; Winzeler E; Zhou Y
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Apr; 5():42. PubMed ID: 15099405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A mixture model approach to sample size estimation in two-sample comparative microarray experiments.
    Jørstad TS; Midelfart H; Bones AM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Feb; 9():117. PubMed ID: 18298817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data.
    Xie Y; Pan W; Khodursky AB
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4280-8. PubMed ID: 16188930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. False discovery rate, sensitivity and sample size for microarray studies.
    Pawitan Y; Michiels S; Koscielny S; Gusnanto A; Ploner A
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):3017-24. PubMed ID: 15840707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On correcting the overestimation of the permutation-based false discovery rate estimator.
    Jiao S; Zhang S
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(15):1655-61. PubMed ID: 18573796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quick calculation for sample size while controlling false discovery rate with application to microarray analysis.
    Liu P; Hwang JT
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 17237060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identifying differentially expressed genes using false discovery rate controlling procedures.
    Reiner A; Yekutieli D; Benjamini Y
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Feb; 19(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 12584122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Power and sample size estimation in microarray studies.
    Lin WJ; Hsueh HM; Chen JJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Jan; 11():48. PubMed ID: 20100337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sample size for gene expression microarray experiments.
    Tsai CA; Wang SJ; Chen DT; Chen JJ
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 21(8):1502-8. PubMed ID: 15564298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ranking analysis of F-statistics for microarray data.
    Tan YD; Fornage M; Xu H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Mar; 9():142. PubMed ID: 18325100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
    Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comments on the analysis of unbalanced microarray data.
    Kerr KF
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Aug; 25(16):2035-41. PubMed ID: 19528084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating the false discovery rate using nonparametric deconvolution.
    van de Wiel MA; Kim KI
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):806-15. PubMed ID: 17825012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An empirical bayes adjustment to increase the sensitivity of detecting differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments.
    Datta S; Satten GA; Benos DJ; Xia J; Heslin MJ; Datta S
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Jan; 20(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 14734315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Power and sample size calculation for microarray studies.
    Jung SH; Young SS
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 22204525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.