542 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19478543)
41. Detecting cataract causing visual impairment using a nonmydriatic fundus camera.
Ferraro JG; Pollard T; Muller A; Lamoureux EL; Taylor HR
Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Apr; 139(4):725-6. PubMed ID: 15808179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Screening for diabetic retinopathy in remote Australia: a program description and evaluation of a devolved model.
Mak DB; Plant AJ; McAllister I
Aust J Rural Health; 2003 Oct; 11(5):224-30. PubMed ID: 14641219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Quality assurance for diabetic retinopathy telescreening.
Schneider S; Aldington SJ; Kohner EM; Luzio S; Owens DR; Schmidt V; Schuell H; Zahlmann G
Diabet Med; 2005 Jun; 22(6):794-802. PubMed ID: 15910634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Evaluation of a local optometric diabetic retinopathy screening service.
Warburton TJ; Hale PJ; Dewhurst JA
Diabet Med; 2004 Jun; 21(6):632-5. PubMed ID: 15154953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Constructing retinal fundus photomontages. A new computer-based method.
Mahurkar AA; Vivino MA; Trus BL; Kuehl EM; Datiles MB; Kaiser-Kupfer MI
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Jul; 37(8):1675-83. PubMed ID: 8675411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: developing a standardized photographic protocol for St. John's Hospital.
Herd H; Aldington SJ
J Audiov Media Med; 2002 Mar; 25(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 12025488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: review of current methods.
Guigui S; Lifshitz T; Levy J
Hosp Pract (1995); 2012 Apr; 40(2):64-72. PubMed ID: 22615080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Evaluation of the effect of JPEG and JPEG2000 image compression on the detection of diabetic retinopathy.
Conrath J; Erginay A; Giorgi R; Lecleire-Collet A; Vicaut E; Klein JC; Gaudric A; Massin P
Eye (Lond); 2007 Apr; 21(4):487-93. PubMed ID: 16456597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Digital camera images obtained using a light-emitting diode illuminator and their dermatological applications.
Ahn HH; Kim SN; Kye YC
Skin Res Technol; 2006 Feb; 12(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 16420533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Implementation of national diabetes retinal screening programme is associated with a lower proportion of patients referred to ophthalmology.
Leese GP; Morris AD; Swaminathan K; Petrie JR; Sinharay R; Ellingford A; Taylor A; Jung RT; Newton RW; Ellis JD
Diabet Med; 2005 Aug; 22(8):1112-5. PubMed ID: 16026382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Smartphone-based fundus camera device (MII Ret Cam) and technique with ability to image peripheral retina.
Sharma A; Subramaniam SD; Ramachandran KI; Lakshmikanthan C; Krishna S; Sundaramoorthy SK
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2016; 26(2):142-4. PubMed ID: 26350993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A simple way to take pictures during endoscopic procedures.
Truzzi JC; Bruschini H; Simonetti R; Andreoni C; Ortiz V; Srougi M
J Urol; 2004 Jan; 171(1):327-8. PubMed ID: 14665907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Anterior and posterior segment photography. An alternative approach using a dSLR camera adaptor.
Pirie CG; Pizzirani S
Vet Ophthalmol; 2012 Jul; 15(4):280-7. PubMed ID: 22050841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Digital image compression should be limited in diabetic retinopathy screening.
Basu A
J Telemed Telecare; 2006; 12(4):163-5. PubMed ID: 16774695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. A mobile phone-based retinal camera for portable wide field imaging.
Maamari RN; Keenan JD; Fletcher DA; Margolis TP
Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Apr; 98(4):438-41. PubMed ID: 24344230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Early detection of diabetes retinopathy by new algorithms for automatic recognition of vascular changes.
Englmeier KH; Schmid K; Hildebrand C; Bichler S; Porta M; Maurino M; Bek T
Eur J Med Res; 2004 Oct; 9(10):473-8. PubMed ID: 15546814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Image quality characteristics of a novel colour scanning digital ophthalmoscope (SDO) compared with fundus photography.
Strauss RW; Krieglstein TR; Priglinger SG; Reis W; Ulbig MW; Kampik A; Neubauer AS
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Nov; 27(6):611-8. PubMed ID: 17956367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Automated quality evaluation of digital fundus photographs.
Bartling H; Wanger P; Martin L
Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 Sep; 87(6):643-7. PubMed ID: 19719806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Establishing ongoing quality assurance in a retinal screening programme.
Arun CS; Young D; Batey D; Shotton M; Mitchie D; Stannard KP; Taylor R
Diabet Med; 2006 Jun; 23(6):629-34. PubMed ID: 16759304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Amblyopia detection by camera: Gateway to portable, inexpensive vision screening (calibration and validation of inexpensive, pocket-sized photoscreeners).
Arnold RW; Arnold AW; Stark L; Arnold KK; Leman R; Armitage MD
Alaska Med; 2004; 46(3):63-72. PubMed ID: 15839597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
