BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19478639)

  • 21. Observation of super-resolution in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Acciavatti RJ; Maidment AD
    Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7518-39. PubMed ID: 23231301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Improved digital breast tomosynthesis images using automated ultrasound.
    Zhang X; Yuan J; Du S; Kripfgans OD; Wang X; Carson PL; Liu X
    Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061911. PubMed ID: 24877822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Digital tomosynthesis: technique.
    Yaffe MJ; Mainprize JG
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2014 May; 52(3):489-97. PubMed ID: 24792651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of a variable dose acquisition technique for microcalcification and mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Das M; Gifford HC; O'Connor JM; Glick SJ
    Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):1976-84. PubMed ID: 19610286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Voting strategy for artifact reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Wu T; Moore RH; Kopans DB
    Med Phys; 2006 Jul; 33(7):2461-71. PubMed ID: 16898449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A virtual trial framework for quantifying the detectability of masses in breast tomosynthesis projection data.
    Young S; Bakic PR; Myers KJ; Jennings RJ; Park S
    Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051914. PubMed ID: 23635284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison study of reconstruction algorithms for prototype digital breast tomosynthesis using various breast phantoms.
    Kim YS; Park HS; Lee HH; Choi YW; Choi JG; Kim HH; Kim HJ
    Radiol Med; 2016 Feb; 121(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 26383027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis.
    Wu T; Moore RH; Rafferty EA; Kopans DB
    Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2636-47. PubMed ID: 15487747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Deep-learning-based projection-domain breast thickness estimation for shape-prior iterative image reconstruction in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Lee S; Kim H; Lee H; Cho S
    Med Phys; 2022 Jun; 49(6):3670-3682. PubMed ID: 35297075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Development of a chest digital tomosynthesis R/F system and implementation of low-dose GPU-accelerated compressed sensing (CS) image reconstruction.
    Choi S; Lee H; Lee D; Choi S; Lee CL; Kwon W; Shin J; Seo CW; Kim HJ
    Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1871-1888. PubMed ID: 29500855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of angular dose distribution on the detection of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Hu YH; Zhao W
    Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2455-66. PubMed ID: 21776781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A novel pre-processing technique for improving image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Kim H; Lee T; Hong J; Sabir S; Lee JR; Choi YW; Kim HH; Chae EY; Cho S
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):417-425. PubMed ID: 28032909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A deep learning approach to estimate x-ray scatter in digital breast tomosynthesis: From phantom models to clinical applications.
    Pinto MC; Mauter F; Michielsen K; Biniazan R; Kappler S; Sechopoulos I
    Med Phys; 2023 Aug; 50(8):4744-4757. PubMed ID: 37394837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A synthesizing method for signal-enhanced and artifact-reduced mammogram from digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Kim H; Hong J; Lee T; Choi YW; Kim HH; Chae EY; Choi WJ; Cho S
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Nov; 65(21):215026. PubMed ID: 33151909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An adaptive multiscale anisotropic diffusion regularized image reconstruction method for digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Liu Y; Zhang C; Li W; Tang Y; Gao X
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2018 Dec; 41(4):993-1008. PubMed ID: 30374771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Weighted simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique for tomosynthesis imaging of objects with high-attenuation features.
    Levakhina YM; Müller J; Duschka RL; Vogt F; Barkhausen J; Buzug TM
    Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):031106. PubMed ID: 23464286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. New reconstruction algorithm for digital breast tomosynthesis: better image quality for humans and computers.
    Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Teuwen J; Vreemann S; Bouwman RW; van Engen RE; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM; Gubern-Merida A; Sechopoulos I
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1051-1059. PubMed ID: 29254355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Multigrid reconstruction with block-iterative updates for breast tomosynthesis.
    Michielsen K; Nuyts J
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6537-48. PubMed ID: 26520744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quantitative image quality measurements of a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
    Olgar T; Kahn T; Gosch D
    Rofo; 2013 Dec; 185(12):1188-94. PubMed ID: 23888475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Experimental validation of a three-dimensional linear system model for breast tomosynthesis.
    Zhao B; Zhou J; Hu YH; Mertelmeier T; Ludwig J; Zhao W
    Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):240-51. PubMed ID: 19235392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.