These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19478996)

  • 21. Comparison of aqueous molecular dynamics with NMR relaxation and residual dipolar couplings favors internal motion in a mannose oligosaccharide.
    Almond A; Bunkenborg J; Franch T; Gotfredsen CH; Duus JO
    J Am Chem Soc; 2001 May; 123(20):4792-802. PubMed ID: 11457289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Conformational flexibility of a microcrystalline globular protein: order parameters by solid-state NMR spectroscopy.
    Lorieau JL; McDermott AE
    J Am Chem Soc; 2006 Sep; 128(35):11505-12. PubMed ID: 16939274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Computational modeling multiple conformational states of proteins with residual dipolar coupling data.
    Abdollahi H; Prestegard JH; Valafar H
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2023 Oct; 82():102655. PubMed ID: 37454402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Simultaneous determination of protein structure and dynamics.
    Lindorff-Larsen K; Best RB; Depristo MA; Dobson CM; Vendruscolo M
    Nature; 2005 Jan; 433(7022):128-32. PubMed ID: 15650731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The MUMO (minimal under-restraining minimal over-restraining) method for the determination of native state ensembles of proteins.
    Richter B; Gsponer J; Várnai P; Salvatella X; Vendruscolo M
    J Biomol NMR; 2007 Feb; 37(2):117-35. PubMed ID: 17225069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Molecular Dynamics Simulations Combined with Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and/or Small-Angle X-ray Scattering Data for Characterizing Intrinsically Disordered Protein Conformational Ensembles.
    Chan-Yao-Chong M; Durand D; Ha-Duong T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 May; 59(5):1743-1758. PubMed ID: 30840442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Exploring the dynamic information content of a protein NMR structure: comparison of a molecular dynamics simulation with the NMR and X-ray structures of Escherichia coli ribonuclease HI.
    Philippopoulos M; Lim C
    Proteins; 1999 Jul; 36(1):87-110. PubMed ID: 10373009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A J-modulated protonless NMR experiment characterizes the conformational ensemble of the intrinsically disordered protein WIP.
    Rozentur-Shkop E; Goobes G; Chill JH
    J Biomol NMR; 2016 Dec; 66(4):243-257. PubMed ID: 27844185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Interpreting dynamically-averaged scalar couplings in proteins.
    Lindorff-Larsen K; Best RB; Vendruscolo M
    J Biomol NMR; 2005 Aug; 32(4):273-80. PubMed ID: 16211481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Simultaneous determination of protein backbone structure and dynamics from residual dipolar couplings.
    Bouvignies G; Markwick P; Brüschweiler R; Blackledge M
    J Am Chem Soc; 2006 Nov; 128(47):15100-1. PubMed ID: 17117856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mapping the conformational landscape of urea-denatured ubiquitin using residual dipolar couplings.
    Meier S; Grzesiek S; Blackledge M
    J Am Chem Soc; 2007 Aug; 129(31):9799-807. PubMed ID: 17636913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Selecting Conformational Ensembles Using Residual Electron and Anomalous Density (READ).
    Salmon L; Ahlstrom LS; Bardwell JCA; Horowitz S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1764():491-504. PubMed ID: 29605935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Flexible backbone sampling methods to model and design protein alternative conformations.
    Ollikainen N; Smith CA; Fraser JS; Kortemme T
    Methods Enzymol; 2013; 523():61-85. PubMed ID: 23422426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. NMR hawk-eyed view of AlphaFold2 structures.
    Zweckstetter M
    Protein Sci; 2021 Nov; 30(11):2333-2337. PubMed ID: 34469019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Weak alignment NMR: a hawk-eyed view of biomolecular structure.
    Bax A; Grishaev A
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2005 Oct; 15(5):563-70. PubMed ID: 16140525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Orienting domains in proteins using dipolar couplings measured by liquid-state NMR: differences in solution and crystal forms of maltodextrin binding protein loaded with beta-cyclodextrin.
    Skrynnikov NR; Goto NK; Yang D; Choy WY; Tolman JR; Mueller GA; Kay LE
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Feb; 295(5):1265-73. PubMed ID: 10653702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Computational identification of slow conformational fluctuations in proteins.
    Ramanathan A; Agarwal PK
    J Phys Chem B; 2009 Dec; 113(52):16669-80. PubMed ID: 19908896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Improving the accuracy of protein stability predictions with multistate design using a variety of backbone ensembles.
    Davey JA; Chica RA
    Proteins; 2014 May; 82(5):771-84. PubMed ID: 24174277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Modeling protein conformational ensembles: from missing loops to equilibrium fluctuations.
    Shehu A; Clementi C; Kavraki LE
    Proteins; 2006 Oct; 65(1):164-79. PubMed ID: 16917941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Interdomain dynamics explored by paramagnetic NMR.
    Russo L; Maestre-Martinez M; Wolff S; Becker S; Griesinger C
    J Am Chem Soc; 2013 Nov; 135(45):17111-20. PubMed ID: 24111622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.