These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19479460)

  • 1. The Advanced Bionics High Resolution Mode: stimulation rates up to 5000 pps.
    Buechner A; Frohne-Büchner C; Gaertner L; Stoever T; Battmer RD; Lenarz T
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2010; 130(1):114-23. PubMed ID: 19479460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of speech processing strategies used in the Clarion implant processor.
    Loizou PC; Stickney G; Mishra L; Assmann P
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 12598809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.
    Plant K; Holden L; Skinner M; Arcaroli J; Whitford L; Law MA; Nel E
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Main peak interleaved sampling (MPIS) strategy: effect of stimulation rate variations on speech perception in adult cochlear implant recipients using the Digisonic SP cochlear implant.
    Di Lella F; Bacciu A; Pasanisi E; Vincenti V; Guida M; Bacciu S
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2010; 130(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 19424919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The Clarion cochlear implant--technical principles, initial clinical experiences and results].
    Lenarz T; Battmer RD
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Jan; 75(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 8851112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of pulse width, pulse rate and paired electrode stimulation on psychophysical measures of dynamic range and speech recognition in cochlear implants.
    Bonnet RM; Boermans PP; Avenarius OF; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):489-96. PubMed ID: 22517184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Current steering and results from novel speech coding strategies.
    Buechner A; Brendel M; Krüeger B; Frohne-Büchner C; Nogueira W; Edler B; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):203-7. PubMed ID: 18223448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of stimulation rate with the Nucleus 24 ACE speech coding strategy.
    Holden LK; Skinner MW; Holden TA; Demorest ME
    Ear Hear; 2002 Oct; 23(5):463-76. PubMed ID: 12411779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A high rate n-of-m speech processing strategy for the first generation Clarion cochlear implant.
    Buechner A; Frohne-Buechner C; Boyle P; Battmer RD; Lenarz T
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Dec; 48(12):868-75. PubMed ID: 20017683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of a paired or sequential stimulation paradigm with advanced bionics' high-resolution mode.
    Buechner A; Frohne-Buechner C; Stoever T; Gaertner L; Battmer RD; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2005 Sep; 26(5):941-7. PubMed ID: 16151341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.
    Potts LG; Skinner MW; Gotter BD; Strube MJ; Brenner CA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):495-511. PubMed ID: 17609612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Speech discrimination in noise for patients with cochlear implants].
    Hamzavi J; Adunka O; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):498-504. PubMed ID: 10890128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using current steering to increase spectral resolution in CII and HiRes 90K users.
    Koch DB; Downing M; Osberger MJ; Litvak L
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):38S-41S. PubMed ID: 17496643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Loudness growth in cochlear implants: effect of stimulation rate and electrode configuration.
    Fu QJ
    Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):55-62. PubMed ID: 15811699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of Advanced Bionics high resolution mode.
    Buechner A; Frohne-Buechner C; Gaertner L; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Battmer RD; Lenarz T
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Jul; 45(7):407-16. PubMed ID: 16938799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system.
    Vandali AE; Whitford LA; Plant KL; Clark GM
    Ear Hear; 2000 Dec; 21(6):608-24. PubMed ID: 11132787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.