These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19480589)

  • 1. Exploring the relationship between faculty, students, and the Social and Behavioral Ethics Review Committee through action research.
    Griebling S; Zayas VR; Borders C; Moore E; Sokol A; Brydon-Miller M; Gerlach J; Norman C;
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2009 Jun; 4(2):27-36. PubMed ID: 19480589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Teaching research ethics: illustrating the nature of the researcher-IRB relationship.
    Brinthaupt TM
    Teach Psychol; 2002; 29(3):243-5. PubMed ID: 15295829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of the ethical review process in Sudan.
    Elsayed DE; Kass NE
    Dev World Bioeth; 2007 Dec; 7(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 18021119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhancing behavioral science education at the Ohio State University College of Medicine.
    Post DM; Stone LC; Knutson DJ; Gutierrez TL; Sari F; Hudson WA
    Acad Med; 2008 Jan; 83(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 18162747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Ethics Committee of the General Faculty Hospital and First Medical Faculty, Charles University.
    Vrbová H; Hrubantová L
    Sb Lek; 1997; 98(3):237-41. PubMed ID: 9601817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Human research ethics in practice: deliberative strategies, processes and perceptions.
    Gillam L; Guillemin M; Bolitho A; Rosenthal D
    Monash Bioeth Rev; 2009 Mar; 28(1):7.1-17. PubMed ID: 19839277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A relational ethical dialogue with research ethics committees.
    Larkin PJ; de Casterlé BD; Schotsmans P
    Nurs Ethics; 2008 Mar; 15(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 18272613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Medical research and the ethics committee. A questionnaire study among project leaders in the health region 4].
    Hals A; Jacobsen G
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1994 Dec; 114(30):3650-4. PubMed ID: 7825151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A multicenter study of the awareness and attitudes of Egyptian faculty towards research ethics: a pilot study.
    Kandeel N; El-Nemer A; Ali NM; Kassem H; El-Setouhy M; Elgharieb ME; Darwish M; Awadalla NJ; Moni M; Silverman HJ
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2011 Dec; 6(4):99-108. PubMed ID: 22228064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The research advisory committee: an effective forum for developing a research dynamic environment.
    Howland L; Sullivan-Bolyai S; Bova C; Klar R; Harper D; Schilling L
    J Prof Nurs; 2008; 24(4):241-5. PubMed ID: 18662660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Communication deficiencies in research and monitoring by ethics committees.
    Karunaratne AS; Myles PS; Ago MJ; Komesaroff PA
    Intern Med J; 2006 Feb; 36(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 16472262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Twenty years of the ethics committee at the medical faculty of the University of Vienna. An interim report.
    Druml C; Svolba G; Singer EA; Bonkovsky FO; Bauer P
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1999 Dec; 111(24):1019-26. PubMed ID: 10677888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enhancing communication among data monitoring committees and institutional review boards.
    Taylor HA; Chaisson L; Sugarman J
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 18559418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychology faculty satisfaction and compliance with IRB procedures.
    Liddle BJ; Brazelton EW
    IRB; 1996; 18(6):4-6. PubMed ID: 11654744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Protecting the human subjects of social science research--the role of institutional review boards.
    Reynolds D
    Bioethics Forum; 2000; 16(4):31-6. PubMed ID: 11902182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using postgraduate students' evaluations of research experience to benchmark departments and faculties: issues and challenges.
    Ginns P; Marsh HW; Behnia M; Cheng JH; Scalas LF
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2009 Sep; 79(Pt 3):577-98. PubMed ID: 19583896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlates of faculty and student attitudes toward evaluation in behavioral aspects of clinical practice.
    Cohen L; Bebermeyer RD; Dana AH; Bosmajian CP
    J Dent Educ; 1983 May; 47(5):346-8. PubMed ID: 6575054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A health researcher's guide to qualitative methodologies.
    Dew K
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2007 Oct; 31(5):433-7. PubMed ID: 17931290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetic screening: programs, principles, and research--thirty years later. Reviewing the recommendations of the Committee for the Study of Inborn Errors of Metabolism (SIEM).
    Simopoulos AP;
    Public Health Genomics; 2009; 12(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 19039254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An ethics committee reflects; and research in the place where you work--some responses.
    Westhead H; Meyer J
    Bull Med Ethics; 2003 May; (188):20-2; author reply 22. PubMed ID: 14983862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.