These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19480757)
1. Quantitative ex vivo and in vivo comparison of lumen dimensions measured by optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in human coronary arteries. Gonzalo N; Serruys PW; García-García HM; van Soest G; Okamura T; Ligthart J; Knaapen M; Verheye S; Bruining N; Regar E Rev Esp Cardiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):615-24. PubMed ID: 19480757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. OCT compared with IVUS in a coronary lesion assessment: the OPUS-CLASS study. Kubo T; Akasaka T; Shite J; Suzuki T; Uemura S; Yu B; Kozuma K; Kitabata H; Shinke T; Habara M; Saito Y; Hou J; Suzuki N; Zhang S JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1095-1104. PubMed ID: 24011777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vivo volumetric analysis of coronary stent using optical coherence tomography with a novel balloon occlusion-flushing catheter: a comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Kawase Y; Hoshino K; Yoneyama R; McGregor J; Hajjar RJ; Jang IK; Hayase M Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 31(10):1343-9. PubMed ID: 16223637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo comparison of lumen dimensions measured by time domain-, and frequency domain-optical coherence tomography, and intravascular ultrasound. Kim SJ; Lee H; Kato K; Yonetsu T; Jang IK Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jun; 29(5):967-75. PubMed ID: 23292151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography. Tu S; Xu L; Ligthart J; Xu B; Witberg K; Sun Z; Koning G; Reiber JH; Regar E Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Aug; 28(6):1315-27. PubMed ID: 22261998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography assessment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease-a comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Fujino Y; Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Wang W; Yamamoto H; Chamié D; Kanaya T; Mehanna E; Tahara S; Nakamura S; Costa MA Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 82(3):E173-83. PubMed ID: 23359350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Discrepancy between frequency domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in human coronary arteries and in a phantom in vitro coronary model. Kim IC; Nam CW; Cho YK; Park HS; Yoon HJ; Kim H; Chung IS; Han S; Hur SH; Kim YN; Kim KB Int J Cardiol; 2016 Oct; 221():860-6. PubMed ID: 27434362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention. Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Sirbu V; Musumeci G; Lortkipanidze N; Fujino Y; Wang W; Nakamura S; Erglis A; Guagliumi G; Costa MA JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Mar; 6(3):228-36. PubMed ID: 23517833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vivo comparison between optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound for detecting small degrees of in-stent neointima after stent implantation. Suzuki Y; Ikeno F; Koizumi T; Tio F; Yeung AC; Yock PG; Fitzgerald PJ; Fearon WF JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Apr; 1(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 19463295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Stent Expansion Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound: The ILUMIEN II Study (Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography [OCT] in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR] and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). Maehara A; Ben-Yehuda O; Ali Z; Wijns W; Bezerra HG; Shite J; Généreux P; Nichols M; Jenkins P; Witzenbichler B; Mintz GS; Stone GW JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 8(13):1704-14. PubMed ID: 26585621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vivo comparison of Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasonography. Ramesh S; Papayannis A; Abdel-karim AR; Banerjee S; Brilakis E J Invasive Cardiol; 2012 Mar; 24(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 22388302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combined use of optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound imaging in patients undergoing coronary interventions for stent thrombosis. Alfonso F; Dutary J; Paulo M; Gonzalo N; Pérez-Vizcayno MJ; Jiménez-Quevedo P; Escaned J; Bañuelos C; Hernández R; Macaya C Heart; 2012 Aug; 98(16):1213-20. PubMed ID: 22826559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hybrid intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography catheter for imaging of coronary atherosclerosis. Li BH; Leung AS; Soong A; Munding CE; Lee H; Thind AS; Munce NR; Wright GA; Rowsell CH; Yang VX; Strauss BH; Foster FS; Courtney BK Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Feb; 81(3):494-507. PubMed ID: 22566368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Ex vivo assessment of coronary lesions by optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in comparison with histology results]. Guo J; Sun L; Chen YD; Tian F; Liu HB; Chen L; Sun ZJ; Ren YH; Jin QH; Liu CF; Han BS; Gai LY; Yang TS Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 40(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 22801308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of observer variability and reliability in the assessment of stent deployment: the OCTIVUS study. Magnus PC; Jayne JE; Garcia-Garcia HM; Swart M; van Es GA; Tijssen J; Kaplan AV Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 86(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 25620044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Safety and feasibility of an intravascular optical coherence tomography image wire system in the clinical setting. Yamaguchi T; Terashima M; Akasaka T; Hayashi T; Mizuno K; Muramatsu T; Nakamura M; Nakamura S; Saito S; Takano M; Takayama T; Yoshikawa J; Suzuki T Am J Cardiol; 2008 Mar; 101(5):562-7. PubMed ID: 18307999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]