These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19480895)

  • 1. Evidence-based practice: an introduction and overview.
    Kelly AM
    Semin Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 44(3):131-9. PubMed ID: 19480895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-based radiology: step 1--ask.
    Kelly AM
    Semin Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 44(3):140-6. PubMed ID: 19480896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence-based radiology and the ACR Appropriateness Criteria.
    Blackmore CC; Medina LS
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Jul; 3(7):505-9. PubMed ID: 17412113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence-based radiology: step 3--primary literature validity (critical appraisal).
    Cronin P
    Semin Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 44(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 19480898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence-based radiology: step 2--searching the literature (search).
    Kelly AM
    Semin Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 44(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 19480897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence-based radiology: step 3--critical appraisal of diagnostic literature.
    Cronin P
    Semin Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 44(3):158-65. PubMed ID: 19480899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence-based radiology: step 5--evaluate.
    Cronin P
    Semin Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 44(3):182-3. PubMed ID: 19480903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence-based radiology: step 4--apply.
    Cronin P
    Semin Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 44(3):180-1. PubMed ID: 19480902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In support of the ACR Appropriateness Criteria.
    Sistrom CL;
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 May; 5(5):630-5; discussion 636-7. PubMed ID: 18442767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiology reporting templates in oncology: a time for change.
    Kee D; Zalcberg JR
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Dec; 53(6):511-3. PubMed ID: 20002280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Quality of the reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies: STARD (Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy studies)].
    Tackmann R; Schuetz G; Hamm B; Dewey M
    Rofo; 2010 Aug; 182(8):655-9. PubMed ID: 20677111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the logistics of interpretive radiology reporting: moving beyond procrustes.
    Brenner RJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Aug; 6(8):544-6. PubMed ID: 19643379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Demonstrating the value of imaging to patients' health.
    Hillman BJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Aug; 6(8):543. PubMed ID: 19643378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Safety and efficacy for new techniques and imaging using new equipment to support European legislation: an EU coordination action.
    Zoetelief J; Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(1):110-6. PubMed ID: 18779185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence and the role of diagnostic imaging.
    Reed MH
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Jan; 11(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 24387962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Objective quality metrics and personal dashboards for quality improvement.
    Khorasani R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Aug; 6(8):549-50. PubMed ID: 19643381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Communicating critical results in radiology.
    Hussain S
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2010; 7(2):148-51. PubMed ID: 20142091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What is normal? A clinically useful reference collection of pediatric radiology cases created within a PACS.
    Halsted MJ; Guluzian JK; Perry LA; Little IG; Benton C
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Feb; 2(2):189-92. PubMed ID: 17411790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The new first-year radiology residents rule: is it necessary?
    Teplick SK; Brandon JC
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 May; 5(5):684. PubMed ID: 18442779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correctly using sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values in clinical practice: how to avoid three common pitfalls.
    Naeger DM; Kohi MP; Webb EM; Phelps A; Ordovas KG; Newman TB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jun; 200(6):W566-70. PubMed ID: 23701086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.