545 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19480899)
1. Evidence-based radiology: step 3--critical appraisal of diagnostic literature.
Cronin P
Semin Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 44(3):158-65. PubMed ID: 19480899
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Evidence-based radiology: step 3--primary literature validity (critical appraisal).
Cronin P
Semin Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 44(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 19480898
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Evidence-based radiology: step 4--apply.
Cronin P
Semin Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 44(3):180-1. PubMed ID: 19480902
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evidence-based radiology: step 5--evaluate.
Cronin P
Semin Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 44(3):182-3. PubMed ID: 19480903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Evidence-based radiology: step 2--searching the literature (search).
Kelly AM
Semin Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 44(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 19480897
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Included in Systematic Reviews)].
Schuetz GM; Tackmann R; Hamm B; Dewey M
Rofo; 2010 Nov; 182(11):939-42. PubMed ID: 20922647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Evidence-based medicine: step 3--critical appraisal of therapeutic literature.
Cronin P
Semin Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 44(3):166-9. PubMed ID: 19480900
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence in diagnostic imaging: going beyond accuracy.
Reed MH
J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Feb; 9(2):90-2. PubMed ID: 22305692
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Evidence-based radiology and the ACR Appropriateness Criteria.
Blackmore CC; Medina LS
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Jul; 3(7):505-9. PubMed ID: 17412113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The American Board of Radiology perspective on maintenance of certification: part IV--practice quality improvement in diagnostic radiology.
Strife JL; Kun LE; Becker GJ; Dunnick NR; Bosma J; Hattery RR
J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 May; 4(5):300-4. PubMed ID: 17467612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Evidence-based radiology: step 1--ask.
Kelly AM
Semin Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 44(3):140-6. PubMed ID: 19480896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evidence for diagnostic imaging guidelines.
Reed MH
J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Apr; 12(4):325-6. PubMed ID: 24889477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Peer review in diagnostic radiology: current state and a vision for the future.
Mahgerefteh S; Kruskal JB; Yam CS; Blachar A; Sosna J
Radiographics; 2009; 29(5):1221-31. PubMed ID: 19564252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The demand for proof of quality.
Patti JA
J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Dec; 8(12):817. PubMed ID: 22136992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality--a radiology imperative: interpretation accuracy and pertinence.
Lee JK
J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Mar; 4(3):162-5. PubMed ID: 17412256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The American Board of Radiology perspective on maintenance of certification: Part IV--practice quality improvement in diagnostic radiology.
Strife JL; Kun LE; Becker GJ; Dunnick NR; Bosma J; Hattery RR
Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):631-6. PubMed ID: 17434077
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Demonstrating the value of imaging to patients' health.
Hillman BJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Aug; 6(8):543. PubMed ID: 19643378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. On the logistics of interpretive radiology reporting: moving beyond procrustes.
Brenner RJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Aug; 6(8):544-6. PubMed ID: 19643379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Objective quality metrics and personal dashboards for quality improvement.
Khorasani R
J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Aug; 6(8):549-50. PubMed ID: 19643381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantifying radiation safety and quality in medical imaging, part 3: the quality assurance scorecard.
Reiner BI
J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Oct; 6(10):694-700. PubMed ID: 19800588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
