1838 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19481243)
1. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report.
Fader AN; Escobar PF
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 19481243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
Scheib SA; Fader AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single-port risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy with and without hysterectomy: surgical outcomes and learning curve analysis.
Escobar PF; Starks DC; Fader AN; Barber M; Rojas-Espalliat L
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Oct; 119(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 20579712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Isobaric laparoendoscopic single-site surgery with wound retractor for adnexal tumors: a single center experience with the initial 100 cases.
Takeda A; Imoto S; Mori M; Nakano T; Nakamura H
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Aug; 157(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 21470765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection: analysis of the first 100 cases.
Scribner DR; Walker JL; Johnson GA; McMeekin SD; Gold MA; Mannel RS
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Sep; 82(3):498-503. PubMed ID: 11520146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology.
Bandera CA; Magrina JF
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 21(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 19125000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery in patients with benign adnexal disease.
Escobar PF; Bedaiwy MA; Fader AN; Falcone T
Fertil Steril; 2010 Apr; 93(6):2074.e7-10. PubMed ID: 20100614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: program initiation and outcomes after the first year with comparison with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging.
Veljovich DS; Paley PJ; Drescher CW; Everett EN; Shah C; Peters WA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 198(6):679.e1-9; discussion 679.e9-10. PubMed ID: 18538151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic surgery in complicated gynecologic diseases: experience of Tri-Service General Hospital in Taiwan.
Tan SJ; Lin CK; Fu PT; Liu YL; Sun CC; Chang CC; Yu MH; Lai HC
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 51(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 22482963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in the Gynecologic Oncology Setting.
Moukarzel LA; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):258-263. PubMed ID: 27815041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Results of laparoscopic pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic oncology patients in Bangkok Metropolitan Administration Medical College and Vajira Hospital.
Thavaramara T; Sheanakul C; Hanidhikul P; Ratchanon S; Wiriyasirivaj B; Leelahakorn S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 May; 91(5):619-24. PubMed ID: 18672622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What is the optimal minimally invasive surgical procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman?
Gehrig PA; Cantrell LA; Shafer A; Abaid LN; Mendivil A; Boggess JF
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Oct; 111(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18694588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The value of laparoscopic surgery to stage gynecological cancers: present and future.
Mettler L; Meinhold-Heerlein I
Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Aug; 61(4):319-37. PubMed ID: 19745797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Single-port laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology: seven years of experience at a single institution.
Moulton L; Jernigan AM; Carr C; Freeman L; Escobar PF; Michener CM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):610.e1-610.e8. PubMed ID: 28619688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic management of ovarian cancer.
Jung US; Lee JH; Kyung MS; Choi JS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Feb; 35(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 19215557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The utility of hand-assisted laparoscopy in ovarian cancer.
Krivak TC; Elkas JC; Rose GS; Sundborg M; Winter WE; Carlson J; MacKoul PJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Jan; 96(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 15589583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery using GelPort as the access platform.
Stein RJ; White WM; Goel RK; Irwin BH; Haber GP; Kaouk JH
Eur Urol; 2010 Jan; 57(1):132-6. PubMed ID: 19361916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
