BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

521 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19482515)

  • 1. Lumbar intersegmental spacing and angulation in the modified lateral decubitus position versus variants of prone positioning.
    Agarwal V; Wildstein M; Tillman JB; Pelkey WL; Alamin TF
    Spine J; 2009 Jul; 9(7):580-4. PubMed ID: 19482515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes in the iliac crest-lumbar relationship from standing to prone.
    Chin KR; Kuntz AF; Bohlman HH; Emery SE
    Spine J; 2006; 6(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 16517391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lumbar lordosis in spinal fusion. A comparison of intraoperative results of patient positioning on two different operative table frame types.
    Guanciale AF; Dinsay JM; Watkins RG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Apr; 21(8):964-9. PubMed ID: 8726201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of Surgical Positioning on L4-L5 Accessibility and Lumbar Lordosis in Lateral Transpsoas Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparison of Prone and Lateral Decubitus in Asymptomatic Adults.
    Smith TG; Pollina J; Joseph SA; Howell KM
    World Neurosurg; 2021 May; 149():e705-e713. PubMed ID: 33548538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of operative position on lumbar lordosis. A radiographic study of patients under anesthesia in the prone and 90-90 positions.
    Peterson MD; Nelson LM; McManus AC; Jackson RP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Jun; 20(12):1419-24. PubMed ID: 7676342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The treatment mechanism of an interspinous process implant for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication.
    Richards JC; Majumdar S; Lindsey DP; Beaupré GS; Yerby SA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Apr; 30(7):744-9. PubMed ID: 15803075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Insertion loads of the X STOP interspinous process distraction system designed to treat neurogenic intermittent claudication.
    Talwar V; Lindsey DP; Fredrick A; Hsu KY; Zucherman JF; Yerby SA
    Eur Spine J; 2006 Jun; 15(6):908-12. PubMed ID: 15926059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical study of dynamic changes in L4-L5 foramen surface area in flexion and extension after implantation of four interspinous process devices.
    Hirsch C; Breque C; Ragot S; Pascal-Mousselard H; Richer JP; Scepi M; Khiami F
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Apr; 101(2):215-9. PubMed ID: 25736197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does the Wilson frame assist with optimizing surgical exposure for minimally invasive lumbar fusions?
    Cardoso MJ; Rosner MK
    Neurosurg Focus; 2010 May; 28(5):E20. PubMed ID: 20568937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The DIAM spinal stabilisation system to treat degenerative disease of the lumbosacral spine].
    Hrabálek L; Machác J; Vaverka M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Oct; 76(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 19912707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lumbar Lordosis of Spinal Stenosis Patients during Intraoperative Prone Positioning.
    Lee SK; Lee SH; Song KS; Park BM; Lim SY; Jang G; Lee BS; Moon SH; Lee HM
    Clin Orthop Surg; 2016 Mar; 8(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 26929801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spinous process morphometry for interspinous device implantation in Korean patients.
    Ihm EH; Han IB; Shin DA; Kim TG; Huh R; Chung SS
    World Neurosurg; 2013 Jan; 79(1):172-6. PubMed ID: 22120390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Aperius PercLID stand alone interspinous system for the treatment of degenerative lumbar stenosis: experience on 152 cases.
    Nardi P; Cabezas D; Rea G; Pettorini BL
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 May; 23(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 20065864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Gödde S; Fritsch E; Dienst M; Kohn D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):1693-9. PubMed ID: 12897494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lumbar spine surgery positioning complications: a systematic review.
    Shriver MF; Zeer V; Alentado VJ; Mroz TE; Benzel EC; Steinmetz MP
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Oct; 39(4):E16. PubMed ID: 26424340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Felix-trial. Double-blind randomization of interspinous implant or bony decompression for treatment of spinal stenosis related intermittent neurogenic claudication.
    Moojen WA; Arts MP; Brand R; Koes BW; Peul WC
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2010 May; 11():100. PubMed ID: 20507568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reference data for interpreting widening between spinous processes in the lumbar spine.
    Jackson ER; Lador R; Ben-Galim PJ; Reitman CA; Hipp JA
    Spine J; 2011 Apr; 11(4):336-9. PubMed ID: 21474086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stress fracture of bilateral posterior facet after insertion of interspinous implant.
    Chung KJ; Hwang YS; Koh SH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(10):E380-3. PubMed ID: 19404170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Positioning for lumbar puncture in children evaluated by bedside ultrasound.
    Abo A; Chen L; Johnston P; Santucci K
    Pediatrics; 2010 May; 125(5):e1149-53. PubMed ID: 20403933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Congenital lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective, control-matched, cohort radiographic analysis.
    Singh K; Samartzis D; Vaccaro AR; Nassr A; Andersson GB; Yoon ST; Phillips FM; Goldberg EJ; An HS
    Spine J; 2005; 5(6):615-22. PubMed ID: 16291100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.