These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19482984)

  • 1. Standards for research ethics committees: purpose, problems and the possibilities of other approaches.
    Davies H; Wells F; Czarkowski M
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Jun; 35(6):382-3. PubMed ID: 19482984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval?
    Angell E; Dixon-Woods M
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Feb; 35(2):130-2. PubMed ID: 19181888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Research ethics committees and post-approval activities: a qualitative study on the perspectives of European research ethics committee representatives.
    Cox S; Solbakk JH; Bernabe RDLC
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2022 Nov; 38(11):1897-1907. PubMed ID: 35993742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Research ethics committees; good clinical practice; advance directives.
    Bull Med Ethics; 2005; (209):8-11. PubMed ID: 16830431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identifying structures, processes, resources and needs of research ethics committees in Egypt.
    Sleem H; El-Kamary SS; Silverman HJ
    BMC Med Ethics; 2010 Jun; 11():12. PubMed ID: 20584332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The evaluation of complex clinical trial protocols: resources available to research ethics committees and the use of clinical trial registries--a case study.
    Homedes N; Ugalde A
    J Med Ethics; 2015 Jun; 41(6):464-9. PubMed ID: 25341735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Results of a self-assessment tool to assess the operational characteristics of research ethics committees in low- and middle-income countries.
    Silverman H; Sleem H; Moodley K; Kumar N; Naidoo S; Subramanian T; Jaafar R; Moni M
    J Med Ethics; 2015 Apr; 41(4):332-7. PubMed ID: 24748650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Framework for Assessing Scientific Merit in Ethical Review of Clinical Research.
    Binik A; Hey SP
    Ethics Hum Res; 2019 Mar; 41(2):2-13. PubMed ID: 30895755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring inconsistency in research ethics committee review.
    Trace S; Kolstoe SE
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):65. PubMed ID: 29179709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How can we provide effective training for research ethics committee members? A European assessment.
    Davies H; Wells F; Druml C
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Apr; 34(4):301-2. PubMed ID: 18375685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A syllabus for research ethics committees: training needs and resources in different European countries.
    Cairoli E; Davies HT; Helm J; Hook G; Knupfer P; Wells F
    J Med Ethics; 2012 Mar; 38(3):184-6. PubMed ID: 21937459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multicentre trials review process by research ethics committees in Spain: where do they stand before implementing the new European regulation?
    Dal-Ré R; Ortega R; Morejón E
    J Med Ethics; 2005 Jun; 31(6):344-50. PubMed ID: 15923484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Status of national research bioethics committees in the WHO African region.
    Kirigia JM; Wambebe C; Baba-Moussa A
    BMC Med Ethics; 2005 Oct; 6():E10. PubMed ID: 16242014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Familiar ethical issues amplified: how members of research ethics committees describe ethical distinctions between disaster and non-disaster research.
    Tansey CM; Anderson J; Boulanger RF; Eckenwiler L; Pringle J; Schwartz L; Hunt M
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Jun; 18(1):44. PubMed ID: 28659166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Professional and academic profile of the Brazilian research ethics committees.
    de Veras Santos EP; Guerriero ICZ
    BMC Med Ethics; 2022 Nov; 23(1):109. PubMed ID: 36368994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ethics review needs to grow up.
    Nicholson RH
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2002; 32(3):8. PubMed ID: 12085519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Research ethics committee: getting started.
    Macpherson CC
    West Indian Med J; 2001 Sep; 50(3):186-8. PubMed ID: 11769020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lay REC members: patient or public?
    Staley K
    J Med Ethics; 2013 Dec; 39(12):780-2. PubMed ID: 23536688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Training needs assessment in research ethics evaluation among research ethics committee members in three African countries: Cameroon, Mali and Tanzania.
    Ateudjieu J; Williams J; Hirtle M; Baume C; Ikingura J; Niaré A; Sprumont D
    Dev World Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(2):88-98. PubMed ID: 19912281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Small is beautiful: demystifying and simplifying standard operating procedures: a model from the ethics review and consultancy committee of the Cameroon Bioethics Initiative.
    Ouwe Missi Oukem-Boyer O; Munung NS; Tangwa GB
    BMC Med Ethics; 2016 May; 17(1):27. PubMed ID: 27178053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.