260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19484175)
1. Round gel breast implants or anatomic gel breast implants: which is the best choice?
Cárdenas-Camarena L; Encinas-Brambila J
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Sep; 33(5):743-51. PubMed ID: 19484175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective study comparing two brands of cohesive gel breast implants with anatomic shape: 5-year follow-up evaluation.
Niechajev I; Jurell G; Lohjelm L
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2007; 31(6):697-710. PubMed ID: 17653683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Management of tuberous breast deformity with anatomic cohesive silicone gel breast implants.
Panchapakesan V; Brown MH
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Jan; 33(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 18752021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional evaluation of breast augmentation and the influence of anatomic and round implants on operative breast shape changes.
Kovacs L; Eder M; Zimmermann A; Müller D; Schuster T; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E; Klöppel M; Machens HG
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):879-87. PubMed ID: 22535137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimizing outcomes in breast augmentation: seven years of experience with the subfascial plane.
Góes JC; Landecker A
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2003; 27(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 12925857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction.
Spear SL; Pelletiere CV; Menon N
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004; 28(5):259-67. PubMed ID: 15529204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Maximizing the use of precapsular space and the choice of implant type in breast augmentation mammaplasty revisions: review of 49 consecutive procedures and patient satisfaction assessment.
Castello MF; Lazzeri D; Silvestri A; Agostini T; Pascone C; Marcelli C; Gigliotti D; D'Aniello C; Gasparotti M
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Oct; 35(5):828-38. PubMed ID: 21455821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient retention and replacement trends after saline breast implants: are deflations inflationary?
Stevens WG; Pacella SJ; Hirsch E; Stoker DA
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Jan; 33(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 18752020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preliminary report on the use of the Spectra™ implant for the correction of hypoplastic breasts with small-volume asymmetry.
Mazzocchi M; Dessy LA; Gagliardi D; Martano A; Scuderi N
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Mar; 65(3):312-9. PubMed ID: 21992938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast implant stability in the subfascial plane and the new shaped silicone gel breast implants.
Sampaio Góes JC
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2010 Feb; 34(1):23-28. PubMed ID: 19936826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. "Tear-drop augmentation mastopexy": a technique to augment superior pole hollow.
Ceydeli A; Freund RM
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2003; 27(6):425-32; discussion 433. PubMed ID: 14994167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anatomic Implants in Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison of Outcomes and Aesthetic Results Compared to Smooth Round Silicone Implants.
Agochukwu-Nwubah N; Boustany A; Wetzel M; Maus J; Rinker B
Aesthet Surg J; 2019 Jul; 39(8):NP322-NP330. PubMed ID: 30874722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Double breast contour in primary aesthetic breast augmentation: incidence, prevention and treatment.
Médard de Chardon V; Balaguer T; Chignon-Sicard B; Lebreton E
Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Apr; 64(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 20224340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Breast augmentation: indications, types of prostheses, surgical techniques, complications, results].
Bettex S; Gailloud-Matthieu MC; Raffoul W; Egloff DV
Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1999 Sep; 119(9):729-37. PubMed ID: 10528515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Immediate breast reconstruction with definitive anatomical implants after skin-sparing mastectomy.
Salgarello M; Farallo E
Br J Plast Surg; 2005 Mar; 58(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 15710117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endoscopic-assisted transaxillary breast augmentation: minimizing complications and maximizing results with improvements in patient selection and technique.
Kolker AR; Austen WG; Slavin SA
Ann Plast Surg; 2010 May; 64(5):667-73. PubMed ID: 20395798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. "Upside-down" augmentation mastopexy.
Migliori F
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Aug; 35(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 21108035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The "triple-plane technique" for breast augmentation.
Bracaglia R; Gentileschi S; Fortunato R
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Oct; 35(5):859-65. PubMed ID: 21416299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Soft cohesive silicone gel breast prostheses: a comparative prospective study of aesthetic results versus lower cohesivity silicone gel prostheses.
Panettiere P; Marchetti L; Accorsi D
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(5):482-9. PubMed ID: 17399656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Innovative new concepts in augmentative breast surgery. Part II: systematic and drawing.
Millán Mateo J; Vaquero Pérez MM
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2001; 25(6):436-42. PubMed ID: 11731850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
