BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19484800)

  • 1. Structural changes in the acromioclavicular joint measured by ultrasonography during provocative tests.
    Park GY; Park JH; Bae JH
    Clin Anat; 2009 Jul; 22(5):580-5. PubMed ID: 19484800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anatomic and biometric study of the acromioclavicular joint by ultrasound.
    Poncelet E; Demondion X; Lapègue F; Drizenko A; Cotten A; Francke JP
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2003; 25(5-6):439-45. PubMed ID: 13680186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shoulder pain in primary care: diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination tests for non-traumatic acromioclavicular joint pain.
    Cadogan A; McNair P; Laslett M; Hing W
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2013 May; 14():156. PubMed ID: 23634871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of acromioclavicular joint degeneration on orthopedic shoulder tests.
    Ulaşlı AM; Erkeç S; Uyar S; Nacır B; Yılmaz Ö; Erdem HR
    Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi; 2013; 24(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 23692193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultrasonography Leads to Accurate Diagnosis and Management of Painful Acromioclavicular Joint Cyst.
    Chang Chien GC; Best CS; Clay BS; Candido KD
    Pain Pract; 2015 Sep; 15(7):E72-5. PubMed ID: 26013586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic value of physical tests for isolated chronic acromioclavicular lesions.
    Chronopoulos E; Kim TK; Park HB; Ashenbrenner D; McFarland EG
    Am J Sports Med; 2004; 32(3):655-61. PubMed ID: 15090381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of ultrasound guidance in the rate of success of acromioclavicular joint injection: an experimental study on human cadavers.
    Borbas P; Kraus T; Clement H; Grechenig S; Weinberg AM; Heidari N
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2012 Dec; 21(12):1694-7. PubMed ID: 22475721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical study of the ligamentous system of the acromioclavicular joint.
    Fukuda K; Craig EV; An KN; Cofield RH; Chao EY
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1986 Mar; 68(3):434-40. PubMed ID: 3949839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Open versus arthroscopic acromioclavicular joint resection: a retrospective comparison study.
    Elhassan B; Ozbaydar M; Diller D; Massimini D; Higgins LD; Warner JJ
    Arthroscopy; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1224-32. PubMed ID: 19896043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The short term effects of a single corticosteroid injection on the range of motion of the shoulder in patients with isolated acromioclavicular joint arthropathy.
    Kurta I; Datir S; Dove M; Rahmatalla A; Wynn-Jones C; Maffulli N
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2005 Dec; 71(6):656-61. PubMed ID: 16459853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Ultrasound evaluation of the acromioclavicular joint. A comparison with magnetic resonance imaging].
    Heers G; Götz J; Schachner H; Neumaier U; Grifka J; Hedtmann A
    Sportverletz Sportschaden; 2005 Dec; 19(4):177-81. PubMed ID: 16369905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A stress MRI of the shoulder for evaluation of ligamentous stabilizers in acute and chronic acromioclavicular joint instabilities.
    Izadpanah K; Winterer J; Vicari M; Jaeger M; Maier D; Eisebraun L; Ute Will J; Kotter E; Langer M; Südkamp NP; Hennig J; Weigel M
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Jun; 37(6):1486-92. PubMed ID: 23165951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anatomical observations of the human acromioclavicular joint.
    Emura K; Arakawa T; Miki A; Terashima T
    Clin Anat; 2014 Oct; 27(7):1046-52. PubMed ID: 24752963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Ultrasound evaluation of the acromioclavicular joint--a correlation of anatomical and sonographical findings].
    Heer G; Götz J; Anders S; Grifka J; Hedtmann A
    Ultraschall Med; 2006 Dec; 27(6):549-52. PubMed ID: 16596519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrasonography as a diagnostic modality in acromioclavicular joint pathologies.
    Blankstein A; Ganel A; Givon U; Dudkiewicz I; Perry M; Diamant L; Chechik A
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2005 Jan; 7(1):28-30. PubMed ID: 15658142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The new 4-dimensional computed tomographic scanner allows dynamic visualization and measurement of normal acromioclavicular joint motion in an unloaded and loaded condition.
    Alta TD; Bell SN; Troupis JM; Coghlan JA; Miller D
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(6):749-54. PubMed ID: 23192215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The function of passive stabilizers of the glenohumeral joint--a biomechanical study].
    Jerosch J; Moersler M; Castro WH
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1990; 128(2):206-12. PubMed ID: 2140655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MR imaging appearances of acromioclavicular joint dislocation.
    Alyas F; Curtis M; Speed C; Saifuddin A; Connell D
    Radiographics; 2008; 28(2):463-79; quiz 619. PubMed ID: 18349451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acromioclavicular joint injury: enhanced technique of examination with dynamic maneuver.
    Peetrons P; Bédard JP
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2007 Jun; 35(5):262-7. PubMed ID: 17410590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Should all acromioclavicular joint injections be performed under image guidance?
    Javed S; Sadozai Z; Javed A; Din A; Schmitgen G
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2017; 25(3):2309499017731633. PubMed ID: 28933229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.