243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19485397)
1. Use of reduced graphs to encode bioisosterism for similarity-based virtual screening.
Birchall K; Gillet VJ; Willett P; Ducrot P; Luttmann C
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1330-46. PubMed ID: 19485397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of topological descriptors for similarity-based virtual screening using multiple bioactive reference structures.
Hert J; Willett P; Wilton DJ; Acklin P; Azzaoui K; Jacoby E; Schuffenhauer A
Org Biomol Chem; 2004 Nov; 2(22):3256-66. PubMed ID: 15534703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Unconventional 2D shape similarity method affords comparable enrichment as a 3D shape method in virtual screening experiments.
Ebalunode JO; Zheng W
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1313-20. PubMed ID: 19480404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. New methods for ligand-based virtual screening: use of data fusion and machine learning to enhance the effectiveness of similarity searching.
Hert J; Willett P; Wilton DJ; Acklin P; Azzaoui K; Jacoby E; Schuffenhauer A
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):462-70. PubMed ID: 16562973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Similarity search profiles as a diagnostic tool for the analysis of virtual screening calculations.
Xue L; Godden JW; Stahura FL; Bajorath J
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(4):1275-81. PubMed ID: 15272835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Scaffold hopping using clique detection applied to reduced graphs.
Barker EJ; Buttar D; Cosgrove DA; Gardiner EJ; Kitts P; Willett P; Gillet VJ
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):503-11. PubMed ID: 16562978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A knowledge-based weighting approach to ligand-based virtual screening.
Stiefl N; Zaliani A
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):587-96. PubMed ID: 16562987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New fragment weighting scheme for the Bayesian inference network in ligand-based virtual screening.
Abdo A; Salim N
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Jan; 51(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 21155550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Enhancing the effectiveness of similarity-based virtual screening using nearest-neighbor information.
Hert J; Willett P; Wilton DJ; Acklin P; Azzaoui K; Jacoby E; Schuffenhauer A
J Med Chem; 2005 Nov; 48(22):7049-54. PubMed ID: 16250664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Virtual screening for R-groups, including predicted pIC50 contributions, within large structural databases, using Topomer CoMFA.
Cramer RD; Cruz P; Stahl G; Curtiss WC; Campbell B; Masek BB; Soltanshahi F
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Nov; 48(11):2180-95. PubMed ID: 18956863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ligand-target interaction-based weighting of substructures for virtual screening.
Crisman TJ; Sisay MT; Bajorath J
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Oct; 48(10):1955-64. PubMed ID: 18821751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The reduced graph descriptor in virtual screening and data-driven clustering of high-throughput screening data.
Harper G; Bravi GS; Pickett SD; Hussain J; Green DV
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(6):2145-56. PubMed ID: 15554685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. LigMatch: a multiple structure-based ligand matching method for 3D virtual screening.
Kinnings SL; Jackson RM
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Sep; 49(9):2056-66. PubMed ID: 19685924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Training similarity measures for specific activities: application to reduced graphs.
Birchall K; Gillet VJ; Harper G; Pickett SD
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):577-86. PubMed ID: 16562986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rapid shape-based ligand alignment and virtual screening method based on atom/feature-pair similarities and volume overlap scoring.
Sastry GM; Dixon SL; Sherman W
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Oct; 51(10):2455-66. PubMed ID: 21870862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative evaluation of 3D virtual ligand screening methods: impact of the molecular alignment on enrichment.
Giganti D; Guillemain H; Spadoni JL; Nilges M; Zagury JF; Montes M
J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jun; 50(6):992-1004. PubMed ID: 20527883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inverse frequency weighting of fragments for similarity-based virtual screening.
Arif SM; Holliday JD; Willett P
J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Aug; 50(8):1340-9. PubMed ID: 20672867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Critical comparison of virtual screening methods against the MUV data set.
Tiikkainen P; Markt P; Wolber G; Kirchmair J; Distinto S; Poso A; Kallioniemi O
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Oct; 49(10):2168-78. PubMed ID: 19799417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. FieldChopper, a new tool for automatic model generation and virtual screening based on molecular fields.
Kalliokoski T; Ronkko T; Poso A
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Jun; 48(6):1131-7. PubMed ID: 18489083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How similar are similarity searching methods? A principal component analysis of molecular descriptor space.
Bender A; Jenkins JL; Scheiber J; Sukuru SC; Glick M; Davies JW
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jan; 49(1):108-19. PubMed ID: 19123924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
