These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19485496)

  • 1. Depolarization ratio measurement using single photomultiplier tube in micropulse lidar.
    Dubey PK; Jain SL; Arya BC; Kulkarni PS
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2009 May; 80(5):053111. PubMed ID: 19485496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New methods of data calibration for high power-aperture lidar.
    Guan S; Yang G; Chang Q; Cheng X; Yang Y; Gong S; Wang J
    Opt Express; 2013 Mar; 21(6):7768-85. PubMed ID: 23546158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Slope characterization in combining analog and photon count data from atmospheric lidar measurements.
    Zhang Y; Yi F; Kong W; Yi Y
    Appl Opt; 2014 Nov; 53(31):7312-20. PubMed ID: 25402893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating random errors due to shot noise in backscatter lidar observations.
    Liu Z; Hunt W; Vaughan M; Hostetler C; McGill M; Powell K; Winker D; Hu Y
    Appl Opt; 2006 Jun; 45(18):4437-47. PubMed ID: 16778954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phase-modulation fluorometer using a dynode-voltage burst-modulated photomultiplier tube.
    Iwata T; Araki T
    Appl Spectrosc; 2005 Aug; 59(8):1049-53. PubMed ID: 16105215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dimensionless parameterization of lidar for laser remote sensing of the atmosphere and its application to systems with SiPM and PMT detectors.
    Agishev R; Comerón A; Rodriguez A; Sicard M
    Appl Opt; 2014 May; 53(15):3164-75. PubMed ID: 24922200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correction for nonlinear photon-counting effects in lidar systems.
    Donovan DP; Whiteway JA; Carswell AI
    Appl Opt; 1993 Nov; 32(33):6742-53. PubMed ID: 20856527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In-line type micropulse lidar with an annular beam: experiment.
    Shiina T; Yoshida K; Ito M; Okamura Y
    Appl Opt; 2005 Dec; 44(34):7407-13. PubMed ID: 16353813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Polarization lidar for shallow water depth measurement.
    Mitchell S; Thayer JP; Hayman M
    Appl Opt; 2010 Dec; 49(36):6995-7000. PubMed ID: 21173834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Novel polarization-sensitive micropulse lidar measurement technique.
    Flynn CJ; Mendoza A; Zheng Y; Mathur S
    Opt Express; 2007 Mar; 15(6):2785-90. PubMed ID: 19532516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Photomultiplier tube calibration based on Na lidar observation and its effect on heat flux bias.
    Liu AZ; Guo Y
    Appl Opt; 2016 Nov; 55(33):9467-9475. PubMed ID: 27869864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ranging performance model considering the pulse pileup effect for PMT-based photon-counting lidars.
    Zhang Z; Ma Y; Li S; Zhao P; Xiang Y; Liu X; Zhang W
    Opt Express; 2020 Apr; 28(9):13586-13600. PubMed ID: 32403830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lidar for multiple backscattering and depolarization observations.
    Allen RJ; Platt CM
    Appl Opt; 1977 Dec; 16(12):3193-9. PubMed ID: 20174327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Practical analytical backscatter error bars for elastic one-component lidar inversion algorithm.
    Rocadenbosch F; Reba MN; Sicard M; Comerón A
    Appl Opt; 2010 Jun; 49(17):3380-93. PubMed ID: 20539358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-signal method for accurate measurements of depolarization ratio with lidar.
    Reichardt J; Baumgart R; McGee TJ
    Appl Opt; 2003 Aug; 42(24):4909-13. PubMed ID: 12952338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Oceanographic lidar profiles compared with estimates from in situ optical measurements.
    Lee JH; Churnside JH; Marchbanks RD; Donaghay PL; Sullivan JM
    Appl Opt; 2013 Feb; 52(4):786-94. PubMed ID: 23385921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Photomultiplier voltage setting: possible important source of variability in molecular equivalents of soluble fluorochrome (MESF) calculation?
    Rigolin GM; Lanza F; Castoldi G
    Cytometry; 1995 Aug; 20(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 7587725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Systematic error of lidar profiles caused by a polarization-dependent receiver transmission: quantification and error correction scheme.
    Mattis I; Tesche M; Grein M; Freudenthaler V; Müller D
    Appl Opt; 2009 May; 48(14):2742-51. PubMed ID: 19424398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improvement on lidar data processing for stratospheric aerosol measurements.
    Likura Y; Sugimoto N; Sasano Y; Shimzu H
    Appl Opt; 1987 Dec; 26(24):5299-306. PubMed ID: 20523520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Imaging photomultiplier array with integrated amplifiers and high-speed USB interface.
    Blacksell M; Wach J; Anderson D; Howard J; Collis SM; Blackwell BD; Andruczyk D; James BW
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2008 Oct; 79(10):10F506. PubMed ID: 19044651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.