These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

444 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19485627)

  • 1. The relative benefits of meta-analysis conducted with individual participant data versus aggregated data.
    Cooper H; Patall EA
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Jun; 14(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 19485627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials.
    Jones AP; Riley RD; Williamson PR; Whitehead A
    Clin Trials; 2009 Feb; 6(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 19254930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Meta-analysis of continuous outcomes combining individual patient data and aggregate data.
    Riley RD; Lambert PC; Staessen JA; Wang J; Gueyffier F; Thijs L; Boutitie F
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(11):1870-93. PubMed ID: 18069721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Empirical comparison of subgroup effects in conventional and individual patient data meta-analyses.
    Koopman L; van der Heijden GJ; Hoes AW; Grobbee DE; Rovers MM
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(3):358-61. PubMed ID: 18601805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An overview of methods and empirical comparison of aggregate data and individual patient data results for investigating heterogeneity in meta-analysis of time-to-event outcomes.
    Smith CT; Williamson PR; Marson AG
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2005 Oct; 11(5):468-78. PubMed ID: 16164588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The meta-analysis of data from individual patients].
    Rovers MM; Reitsma JB
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2012; 156(31):A4743. PubMed ID: 22853768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies using individual patient data and aggregate data.
    Riley RD; Dodd SR; Craig JV; Thompson JR; Williamson PR
    Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(29):6111-36. PubMed ID: 18816508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual patient-level and study-level meta-analysis for investigating modifiers of treatment effect.
    Teramukai S; Matsuyama Y; Mizuno S; Sakamoto J
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2004 Dec; 34(12):717-21. PubMed ID: 15640501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of one-step and two-step meta-analysis models using individual patient data.
    Mathew T; Nordström K
    Biom J; 2010 Apr; 52(2):271-87. PubMed ID: 20349448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient-level compared with study-level meta-analyses demonstrate consistency of D-dimer as predictor of venous thromboembolic recurrences.
    Marcucci M; Smith CT; Douketis JD; Tosetto A; Baglin T; Cushman M; Eichinger S; Palareti G; Poli D; Tait RC; Iorio A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Apr; 66(4):415-25. PubMed ID: 23395515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Four-fold table cell frequencies imputation in meta analysis.
    Di Pietrantonj C
    Stat Med; 2006 Jul; 25(13):2299-322. PubMed ID: 16025540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of meta-synthesis in cardiovascular nursing research.
    Woodend AK
    Can J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2007; 17(3):32-6. PubMed ID: 17941567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of formal statistical significance on the credibility of observational associations.
    Ioannidis JP
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 168(4):374-83; discussion 384-90. PubMed ID: 18611956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Meta-analysis based on individual patient data: example of advanced colorectal cancer].
    Piedbois P; Buyse M
    Rech Soins Infirm; 2010 Jun; (101):25-8. PubMed ID: 20608262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Meta-analyses based on individual patient data (IPD)].
    Bekkering GE; Cools F; Aertgeerts B; de Backer TL; Kellen E; van der Stichele RH; Buntinx F
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009 Feb; 153(9):402-6. PubMed ID: 19348098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual patient data meta-analysis: a promising approach for evidence synthesis in reproductive medicine.
    Broeze KA; Opmeer BC; van der Veen F; Bossuyt PM; Bhattacharya S; Mol BW
    Hum Reprod Update; 2010; 16(6):561-7. PubMed ID: 20819831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meta-analysis of repeated measures study designs.
    Peters JL; Mengersen KL
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):941-50. PubMed ID: 19018929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Meta-analysis of randomised trials with a continuous outcome according to baseline imbalance and availability of individual participant data.
    Riley RD; Kauser I; Bland M; Thijs L; Staessen JA; Wang J; Gueyffier F; Deeks JJ
    Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(16):2747-66. PubMed ID: 23303608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of aggregate and individual participant data approaches to meta-analysis of randomised trials: An observational study.
    Tierney JF; Fisher DJ; Burdett S; Stewart LA; Parmar MKB
    PLoS Med; 2020 Jan; 17(1):e1003019. PubMed ID: 32004320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.