BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19485628)

  • 1. Short and long views of integrative data analysis: comments on contributions to the special issue.
    Shrout PE
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Jun; 14(2):177-81. PubMed ID: 19485628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The metric comparability of meta-analytic effect-size estimators from factorial designs.
    Gillett R
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Dec; 8(4):419-33. PubMed ID: 14664680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ramifications of increased training in quantitative methodology.
    Zimiles H
    Am Psychol; 2009 Jan; 64(1):51. PubMed ID: 19209971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychometric inferences from a meta-analysis of reliability and internal consistency coefficients.
    Botella J; Suero M; Gambara H
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Dec; 15(4):386-97. PubMed ID: 20853953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The future of dynamic factor analysis in psychology and biomedicine.
    Molenaar PC
    Bull Soc Sci Med Grand Duche Luxemb; 2006; (2):201-13. PubMed ID: 17124797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomized trials for the real world: making as few and as reasonable assumptions as possible.
    Baker SG; Kramer BS
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Jun; 17(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 17925312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Overview of quantitative measurement methods. Equivalence, invariance, and differential item functioning in health applications.
    Teresi JA
    Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11 Suppl 3):S39-49. PubMed ID: 17060834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reporting subscores for institutions.
    Haberman S; Sinharay S; Puhan G
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):79-95. PubMed ID: 17937841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving training in methodology enriches the science of psychology.
    Aiken LS; West SG; Millsap RE
    Am Psychol; 2009 Jan; 64(1):discussion 51-2. PubMed ID: 19209970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The will to quantify: conceptions of measurement of medical practice].
    Ogien A
    Ann Econ Soc Civilis; 2000; 55(2):283-312. PubMed ID: 18383635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Re: The design versus the analysis of observational studies for causal effects: parallels with the design of randomized trials.
    Shrier I
    Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(14):2740-1; author reply 2741-2. PubMed ID: 18069729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing quality of reports on randomized clinical trials in nursing journals.
    Parent N; Hanley JA
    Can J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2009; 19(2):25-39. PubMed ID: 19517902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality.
    Krewski D; Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Ma R; Hughes E; Shi Y; Turner MC; Pope CA; Thurston G; Calle EE; Thun MJ; Beckerman B; DeLuca P; Finkelstein N; Ito K; Moore DK; Newbold KB; Ramsay T; Ross Z; Shin H; Tempalski B
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 May; (140):5-114; discussion 115-36. PubMed ID: 19627030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.
    Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett M; van den Brandt P
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Mar; (139):5-71; discussion 73-89. PubMed ID: 19554969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the meaning of formative measurement and how it differs from reflective measurement: comment on Howell, Breivik, and Wilcox (2007).
    Bagozzi RP
    Psychol Methods; 2007 Jun; 12(2):229-37; discussion 238-45. PubMed ID: 17563175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to select, calculate, and interpret effect sizes.
    Durlak JA
    J Pediatr Psychol; 2009 Oct; 34(9):917-28. PubMed ID: 19223279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Explorations in statistics: hypothesis tests and P values.
    Curran-Everett D
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Jun; 33(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 19509391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multilevel modelling: Beyond the basic applications.
    Wright DB; London K
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):439-56. PubMed ID: 18664317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adverse events in randomized trials: neglected, restricted, distorted, and silenced.
    Ioannidis JP
    Arch Intern Med; 2009 Oct; 169(19):1737-9. PubMed ID: 19858427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.