These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

546 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19485681)

  • 21. Dynamic distortion of visual position representation around moving objects.
    Watanabe K; Yokoi K
    J Vis; 2008 Mar; 8(3):13.1-11. PubMed ID: 18484819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Action-specific extrapolation of target motion in human visual system.
    Ashida H
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1515-24. PubMed ID: 15246289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Isoluminant motion onset captures attention.
    Guo RM; Abrams RA; Moscovitch M; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jul; 72(5):1311-6. PubMed ID: 20601712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. How do object reference frames and motion vector decomposition emerge in laminar cortical circuits?
    Grossberg S; Léveillé J; Versace M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1147-70. PubMed ID: 21336518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Motion fading and the motion aftereffect share a common process of neural adaptation.
    Hsieh PJ; Tse PU
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):724-33. PubMed ID: 19429955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. No-onset looming motion guides spatial attention.
    von Mühlenen A; Lleras A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1297-310. PubMed ID: 18085944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Do new objects capture attention?
    Franconeri SL; Hollingworth A; Simons DJ
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Apr; 16(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 15828974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Motion signals deflect relative positions of moving objects.
    Watanabe E; Matsunaga W; Kitaoka A
    Vision Res; 2010 Nov; 50(23):2381-90. PubMed ID: 20875830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The perceived position of a moving object is not the result of position integration.
    Shen M; Zhou J; Gao T; Liang J; Shui R
    Vision Res; 2007 Nov; 47(24):3088-95. PubMed ID: 17905405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Change blindness and visual memory: visual representations get rich and act poor.
    Varakin DA; Levin DT
    Br J Psychol; 2006 Feb; 97(Pt 1):51-77. PubMed ID: 16464287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Speed selectivity in visual short term memory for motion.
    McKeefry DJ; Burton MP; Vakrou C
    Vision Res; 2007 Aug; 47(18):2418-25. PubMed ID: 17655909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Temporal limitations in the effective binding of attended target attributes in the mutual masking of visual objects.
    Hommuk K; Bachmann T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):648-60. PubMed ID: 19485683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Motion extrapolation into the blind spot.
    Maus GW; Nijhawan R
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1087-91. PubMed ID: 19076478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Orientation congruency effects for familiar objects: coordinate transformations in object recognition.
    Graf M; Kaping D; Bülthoff HH
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Mar; 16(3):214-21. PubMed ID: 15733202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of self-motion on attention in real 3D space.
    Kimura T; Miura T; Doi S; Yamamoto Y
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jul; 131(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 19524213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The relationship between object files and conscious perception.
    Mitroff SR; Scholl BJ; Wynn K
    Cognition; 2005 May; 96(1):67-92. PubMed ID: 15833307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Visual impressions of pushing and pulling: the object perceived as causal is not always the one that moves first.
    White PA
    Perception; 2012; 41(10):1193-217. PubMed ID: 23469701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Stereoscopic shape discrimination is well preserved across changes in object size.
    Norman JF; Swindle JM; Jennings LR; Mullins EM; Beers AM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jun; 131(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 19389660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A magnocellular contribution to conscious perception via temporal object segmentation.
    Goodhew SC; Boal HL; Edwards M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Jun; 40(3):948-59. PubMed ID: 24490947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A principal components analysis of dynamic spatial memory biases.
    Motes MA; Hubbard TL; Courtney JR; Rypma B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1076-83. PubMed ID: 18763892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.