These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

382 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19486458)

  • 1. Confocal examination of subsurface cracking in ceramic materials.
    Etman MK
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Oct; 18(7):550-9. PubMed ID: 19486458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of wear when enamel is opposed by various ceramic materials and gold.
    Elmaria A; Goldstein G; Vijayaraghavan T; Legeros RZ; Hittelman EL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Nov; 96(5):345-53. PubMed ID: 17098498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of the antagonist material on the wear of different composites using two different wear simulation methods.
    Heintze SD; Zellweger G; Cavalleri A; Ferracane J
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):166-75. PubMed ID: 16087228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of glazed and polished surface finishes on the friction coefficient of two low-fusing ceramics.
    Schuh C; Kinast EJ; Mezzomo E; Kapczinski MP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):245-52. PubMed ID: 15775925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enamel wear of modified porcelains.
    Imai Y; Suzuki S; Fukushima S
    Am J Dent; 2000 Dec; 13(6):315-23. PubMed ID: 11764126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of veneering porcelain thickness of all-ceramic and metal ceramic crowns on failure resistance after cyclic loading.
    Shirakura A; Lee H; Geminiani A; Ercoli C; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Feb; 101(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 19167536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of interface characterization and adhesion of glass ceramics to commercially pure titanium and gold alloy after thermal- and mechanical-loading.
    Vásquez VZ; Ozcan M; Kimpara ET
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 18718654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative measurement of tooth and ceramic wear: in vivo study.
    Etman MK; Woolford M; Dunne S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(3):245-52. PubMed ID: 18548965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical wear of posterior metal-free polymer crowns. One-year results from a randomized clinical trial.
    Ohlmann B; Uekermann J; Dreyhaupt J; Schmitter M; Mussotter K; Rammelsberg P
    J Dent; 2007 Mar; 35(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 17027139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of artificial saliva storage on microhardness and fracture toughness of a hydrothermal glass-ceramic.
    Fahmy NZ; El Guindy J; Zamzam M
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):324-31. PubMed ID: 19486457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wear behavior of dental Y-TZP ceramic against natural enamel after different finishing procedures.
    Mitov G; Heintze SD; Walz S; Woll K; Muecklich F; Pospiech P
    Dent Mater; 2012 Aug; 28(8):909-18. PubMed ID: 22608163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wear of ceramic and antagonist--a systematic evaluation of influencing factors in vitro.
    Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Forjanic M; Zellweger G; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):433-49. PubMed ID: 17720238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vivo wear of enamel by a lithia disilicate-based core ceramic used for posterior fixed partial dentures: first-year results.
    Esquivel-Upshaw JF; Young H; Jones J; Yang M; Anusavice KJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(4):391-6. PubMed ID: 16900824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wear resistance of nanofilled composite resin and feldspathic ceramic artificial teeth.
    Ghazal M; Albashaireh ZS; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):441-8. PubMed ID: 19033028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of three different methods for the quantification of the in vitro wear of dental materials.
    Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Forjanic M; Zellweger G; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1051-62. PubMed ID: 16386293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of long-term simulated RPD clasp attachment/detachment on retention loss and wear for two clasp types and three abutment material surfaces.
    Helal MA; Baraka OA; Sanad ME; Ludwig K; Kern M
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jul; 21(5):370-7. PubMed ID: 22443158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of surface roughness on mechanical strength of resin composite versus glass ceramic materials.
    Lohbauer U; Müller FA; Petschelt A
    Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 17628659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of two connector designs on the fracture resistance of all-ceramic core materials for fixed dental prostheses.
    Plengsombut K; Brewer JD; Monaco EA; Davis EL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Mar; 101(3):166-73. PubMed ID: 19231568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of glazed and polished ceramics on human enamel wear.
    Olivera AB; Matson E; Marques MM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(6):547-8. PubMed ID: 17165291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of antagonistic surface roughness on the wear of human enamel and nanofilled composite resin artificial teeth.
    Ghazal M; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 19410068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.