These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

752 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19486540)

  • 1. Fpocket: an open source platform for ligand pocket detection.
    Le Guilloux V; Schmidtke P; Tuffery P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Jun; 10():168. PubMed ID: 19486540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. fpocket: online tools for protein ensemble pocket detection and tracking.
    Schmidtke P; Le Guilloux V; Maupetit J; Tufféry P
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2010 Jul; 38(Web Server issue):W582-9. PubMed ID: 20478829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Large-scale comparison of four binding site detection algorithms.
    Schmidtke P; Souaille C; Estienne F; Baurin N; Kroemer RT
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Dec; 50(12):2191-200. PubMed ID: 20828173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MDpocket: open-source cavity detection and characterization on molecular dynamics trajectories.
    Schmidtke P; Bidon-Chanal A; Luque FJ; Barril X
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Dec; 27(23):3276-85. PubMed ID: 21967761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Graph-Based Clustering of Predicted Ligand-Binding Pockets on Protein Surfaces.
    Degac J; Winter U; Helms V
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Sep; 55(9):1944-52. PubMed ID: 26325445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding and predicting druggability. A high-throughput method for detection of drug binding sites.
    Schmidtke P; Barril X
    J Med Chem; 2010 Aug; 53(15):5858-67. PubMed ID: 20684613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Structure-based computational approaches for small-molecule modulation of protein-protein interactions.
    Xu D; Wang B; Meroueh SO
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1278():77-92. PubMed ID: 25859944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. PockDrug-Server: a new web server for predicting pocket druggability on holo and apo proteins.
    Hussein HA; Borrel A; Geneix C; Petitjean M; Regad L; Camproux AC
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Jul; 43(W1):W436-42. PubMed ID: 25956651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visualisation of variable binding pockets on protein surfaces by probabilistic analysis of related structure sets.
    Ashford P; Moss DS; Alex A; Yeap SK; Povia A; Nobeli I; Williams MA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Mar; 13():39. PubMed ID: 22417279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. APoc: large-scale identification of similar protein pockets.
    Gao M; Skolnick J
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Mar; 29(5):597-604. PubMed ID: 23335017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. PockDrug: A Model for Predicting Pocket Druggability That Overcomes Pocket Estimation Uncertainties.
    Borrel A; Regad L; Xhaard H; Petitjean M; Camproux AC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Apr; 55(4):882-95. PubMed ID: 25835082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving protein-ligand binding site prediction accuracy by classification of inner pocket points using local features.
    Krivák R; Hoksza D
    J Cheminform; 2015; 7():12. PubMed ID: 25932051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Protein pocket detection via convex hull surface evolution and associated Reeb graph.
    Zhao R; Cang Z; Tong Y; Wei GW
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Sep; 34(17):i830-i837. PubMed ID: 30423105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Comprehensive Mapping of the Druggable Cavities within the SARS-CoV-2 Therapeutically Relevant Proteins by Combining Pocket and Docking Searches as Implemented in Pockets 2.0.
    Gervasoni S; Vistoli G; Talarico C; Manelfi C; Beccari AR; Studer G; Tauriello G; Waterhouse AM; Schwede T; Pedretti A
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Jul; 21(14):. PubMed ID: 32708196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The scoring bias in reverse docking and the score normalization strategy to improve success rate of target fishing.
    Luo Q; Zhao L; Hu J; Jin H; Liu Z; Zhang L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171433. PubMed ID: 28196116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identification of cavities on protein surface using multiple computational approaches for drug binding site prediction.
    Zhang Z; Li Y; Lin B; Schroeder M; Huang B
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Aug; 27(15):2083-8. PubMed ID: 21636590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anatomy of protein pockets and cavities: measurement of binding site geometry and implications for ligand design.
    Liang J; Edelsbrunner H; Woodward C
    Protein Sci; 1998 Sep; 7(9):1884-97. PubMed ID: 9761470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subpocket-Based Analysis Approach for the Protein Pocket Dynamics.
    Lv N; Cao Z
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2024 Jun; 20(11):4909-4920. PubMed ID: 38772734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Facing the challenges of structure-based target prediction by inverse virtual screening.
    Schomburg KT; Bietz S; Briem H; Henzler AM; Urbaczek S; Rarey M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jun; 54(6):1676-86. PubMed ID: 24851945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. PoLi: A Virtual Screening Pipeline Based on Template Pocket and Ligand Similarity.
    Roy A; Srinivasan B; Skolnick J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Aug; 55(8):1757-70. PubMed ID: 26225536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.