BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

611 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19487523)

  • 1. Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of a constrained condylar knee prosthesis.
    Kim YH; Kim JS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Jun; 91(6):1440-7. PubMed ID: 19487523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Survival of primary condylar-constrained total knee arthroplasty at a minimum of 7 years.
    Maynard LM; Sauber TJ; Kostopoulos VK; Lavigne GS; Sewecke JJ; Sotereanos NG
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1197-201. PubMed ID: 24411081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer-navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty a prospective randomized trial.
    Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Nov; 94(22):2017-24. PubMed ID: 23052635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term clinical outcomes and survivorship of press-fit condylar sigma fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee prostheses in the same patients.
    Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS; Kulkarni SS; Kim YH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Oct; 96(19):e168. PubMed ID: 25274796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the oxford prosthesis in patients with medial compartment arthritis.
    Emerson RH; Higgins LL
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Jan; 90(1):118-22. PubMed ID: 18171965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High-flexion total knee arthroplasty: survivorship and prevalence of osteolysis: results after a minimum of ten years of follow-up.
    Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Aug; 94(15):1378-84. PubMed ID: 22854990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revision for unexplained pain following unicompartmental and total knee replacement.
    Baker PN; Petheram T; Avery PJ; Gregg PJ; Deehan DJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Sep; 94(17):e126. PubMed ID: 22992855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior-stabilized or constrained condylar prosthesis: a minimum 3-year and average 5-year follow-up study.
    Peters CL; Hennessey R; Barden RM; Galante JO; Rosenberg AG
    J Arthroplasty; 1997 Dec; 12(8):896-903. PubMed ID: 9458255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The outcome of rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty with cement at a minimum of ten years of follow-up.
    Argenson JN; Parratte S; Ashour A; Saintmard B; Aubaniac JM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Apr; 94(7):638-44. PubMed ID: 22488620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. LCS mobile-bearing total knee replacement. A 10-year's follow-up study.
    Vogt JC; Saarbach C
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 May; 95(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 19328763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical outcome and survival rate of condylar constrained knee prosthesis in revision total knee arthroplasty: an average nine point six year follow-up.
    Yu M; Xu Y; Weng X; Feng B
    Int Orthop; 2024 May; 48(5):1179-1187. PubMed ID: 38353709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Total knee replacement in young, active patients: long-term follow-up and functional outcome: a concise follow-up of a previous report.
    Long WJ; Bryce CD; Hollenbeak CS; Benner RW; Scott WN
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Sep; 96(18):e159. PubMed ID: 25232089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Medin modular implant for total knee arthroplasty--mid-term results].
    Vavrík P; Landor I; Tomaides J; Popelka S
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Feb; 76(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 19268046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revision total knee arthroplasty in the young patient: is there trouble on the horizon?
    Aggarwal VK; Goyal N; Deirmengian G; Rangavajulla A; Parvizi J; Austin MS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Apr; 96(7):536-42. PubMed ID: 24695919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior stabilized, condylar constrained or fully constrained prosthesis: a minimum 2-year follow-up analysis.
    Hwang SC; Kong JY; Nam DC; Kim DH; Park HB; Jeong ST; Cho SH
    Clin Orthop Surg; 2010 Jun; 2(2):112-20. PubMed ID: 20514269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Total condylar knee arthroplasty. 16- to 21-year results.
    Gill GS; Joshi AB; Mills DM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Oct; (367):210-5. PubMed ID: 10546617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Press-fit condylar design total knee arthroplasty. Fourteen to seventeen-year follow-up.
    Rodricks DJ; Patil S; Pulido P; Colwell CW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Jan; 89(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 17200315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Advantage of minimal anterior knee pain and long-term survivorship of cemented single radius posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty without patella resurfacing.
    Ji HM; Ha YC; Baek JH; Ko YB
    Clin Orthop Surg; 2015 Mar; 7(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 25729519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Salvage revision total knee replacement using the Endo-Model rotating hinge prosthesis.
    Pradhan NR; Bale L; Kay P; Porter ML
    Knee; 2004 Dec; 11(6):469-73. PubMed ID: 15581766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up.
    Berger RA; Meneghini RM; Jacobs JJ; Sheinkop MB; Della Valle CJ; Rosenberg AG; Galante JO
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 May; 87(5):999-1006. PubMed ID: 15866962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.