These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19487714)

  • 1. Advances in measuring the effect of individual predictors of cardiovascular risk: the role of reclassification measures.
    Cook NR; Ridker PM
    Ann Intern Med; 2009 Jun; 150(11):795-802. PubMed ID: 19487714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An assessment of the relationship between clinical utility and predictive ability measures and the impact of mean risk in the population.
    McGeechan K; Macaskill P; Irwig L; Bossuyt PM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Jul; 14():86. PubMed ID: 24989719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combining risk markers improves cardiovascular risk prediction in women.
    Holewijn S; den Heijer M; Kiemeney LA; Stalenhoef AF; de Graaf J
    Clin Sci (Lond); 2014 Jan; 126(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 23879211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinically relevant measures of fit? A note of caution.
    Cook NR
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Sep; 176(6):488-91. PubMed ID: 22875759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of including C-reactive protein in cardiovascular risk prediction models for women.
    Cook NR; Buring JE; Ridker PM
    Ann Intern Med; 2006 Jul; 145(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 16818925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combining CHA
    Chu SY; Li PW; Fan FF; Han XN; Liu L; Wang J; Zhao J; Ye XJ; Ding WH
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2021 Nov; 21(1):276. PubMed ID: 34753422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical risk reclassification at 10 years.
    Cook NR; Demler OV; Paynter NP
    Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(28):4498-4502. PubMed ID: 29156504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deep-learning-based cardiovascular risk stratification using coronary artery calcium scores predicted from retinal photographs.
    Rim TH; Lee CJ; Tham YC; Cheung N; Yu M; Lee G; Kim Y; Ting DSW; Chong CCY; Choi YS; Yoo TK; Ryu IH; Baik SJ; Kim YA; Kim SK; Lee SH; Lee BK; Kang SM; Wong EYM; Kim HC; Kim SS; Park S; Cheng CY; Wong TY
    Lancet Digit Health; 2021 May; 3(5):e306-e316. PubMed ID: 33890578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Soluble vascular adhesion protein-1 predicts incident major adverse cardiovascular events and improves reclassification in a finnish prospective cohort study.
    Aalto K; Havulinna AS; Jalkanen S; Salomaa V; Salmi M
    Circ Cardiovasc Genet; 2014 Aug; 7(4):529-35. PubMed ID: 24850810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cardiovascular Risk Prediction in Men and Women Aged Under 50 Years Using Routine Care Data.
    van Os HJA; Kanning JP; Bonten TN; Rakers MM; Putter H; Numans ME; Ruigrok YM; Groenwold RHH; Wermer MJH
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2023 Apr; 12(7):e027011. PubMed ID: 36942627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development and validation of QRISK3 risk prediction algorithms to estimate future risk of cardiovascular disease: prospective cohort study.
    Hippisley-Cox J; Coupland C; Brindle P
    BMJ; 2017 May; 357():j2099. PubMed ID: 28536104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of additional blood pressure and lipid measurements on the prediction of cardiovascular risk.
    Bell K; Hayen A; McGeechan K; Neal B; Irwig L
    Eur J Prev Cardiol; 2012 Dec; 19(6):1474-85. PubMed ID: 21947629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nontraditional Risk Factors in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
    Lin JS; Evans CV; Johnson E; Redmond N; Coppola EL; Smith N
    JAMA; 2018 Jul; 320(3):281-297. PubMed ID: 29998301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Usefulness of the addition of beta-2-microglobulin, cystatin C and C-reactive protein to an established risk factors model to improve mortality risk prediction in patients undergoing coronary angiography.
    Nead KT; Zhou MJ; Caceres RD; Sharp SJ; Wehner MR; Olin JW; Cooke JP; Leeper NJ
    Am J Cardiol; 2013 Mar; 111(6):851-6. PubMed ID: 23290308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interpreting incremental value of markers added to risk prediction models.
    Pencina MJ; D'Agostino RB; Pencina KM; Janssens AC; Greenland P
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Sep; 176(6):473-81. PubMed ID: 22875755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures.
    Steyerberg EW; Vickers AJ; Cook NR; Gerds T; Gonen M; Obuchowski N; Pencina MJ; Kattan MW
    Epidemiology; 2010 Jan; 21(1):128-38. PubMed ID: 20010215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of Long-term Cumulative Blood Pressure in Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Models.
    Pool LR; Ning H; Wilkins J; Lloyd-Jones DM; Allen NB
    JAMA Cardiol; 2018 Nov; 3(11):1096-1100. PubMed ID: 30193291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Novel metrics for evaluating improvement in discrimination: net reclassification and integrated discrimination improvement for normal variables and nested models.
    Pencina MJ; D'Agostino RB; Demler OV
    Stat Med; 2012 Jan; 31(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 22147389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combining European and U.S. risk prediction models with polygenic risk scores to refine cardiovascular prevention: the CoLaus|PsyCoLaus Study.
    de La Harpe R; Thorball CW; Redin C; Fournier S; Müller O; Strambo D; Michel P; Vollenweider P; Marques-Vidal P; Fellay J; Vaucher J
    Eur J Prev Cardiol; 2023 May; 30(7):561-571. PubMed ID: 36652418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.