These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Does mood influence text processing and comprehension? Evidence from an eye-movement study. Scrimin S; Mason L Br J Educ Psychol; 2015 Sep; 85(3):387-406. PubMed ID: 26010020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Searching for Judy: how small mysteries affect narrative processes and memory. Love J; McKoon G; Gerrig RJ J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):790-6. PubMed ID: 20438273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Revising what readers know: updating text representations during narrative comprehension. Rapp DN; Kendeou P Mem Cognit; 2007 Dec; 35(8):2019-32. PubMed ID: 18265617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Credible narrators and misinformed readers. Houghton KJ; Poirier RC; Klin CM Mem Cognit; 2023 May; 51(4):825-844. PubMed ID: 36450939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Readers' use of source information in text comprehension. Braasch JL; Rouet JF; Vibert N; Britt MA Mem Cognit; 2012 Apr; 40(3):450-65. PubMed ID: 22086649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can confidence help account for and redress the effects of reading inaccurate information? Salovich NA; Donovan AM; Hinze SR; Rapp DN Mem Cognit; 2021 Feb; 49(2):293-310. PubMed ID: 32964382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mood-dependent integration in discourse comprehension: happy and sad moods affect consistency processing via different brain networks. Egidi G; Caramazza A Neuroimage; 2014 Dec; 103():20-32. PubMed ID: 25225000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Before narrative: episodic reading and representations of chronic pain. Wasson S Med Humanit; 2018 Jun; 44(2):106-112. PubMed ID: 29305389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. From simple agents to information sources: Readers' differential processing of story characters as a function of story consistency. Saux G; Vibert N; Dampuré J; Burin DI; Britt MA; Rouet JF Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Jan; 212():103191. PubMed ID: 33147538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evil geniuses: inferences derived from evidence and preferences. Mensink MC; Rapp DN Mem Cognit; 2011 Aug; 39(6):1103-16. PubMed ID: 21424879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Attentional focus affects how events are segmented and updated in narrative reading. Bailey HR; Kurby CA; Sargent JQ; Zacks JM Mem Cognit; 2017 Aug; 45(6):940-955. PubMed ID: 28653273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reading Touch Screen Storybooks with Mothers Negatively Affects 7-Year-Old Readers' Comprehension but Enriches Emotional Engagement. Ross KM; Pye RE; Randell J Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1728. PubMed ID: 27899903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simulating an enactment effect: Pronouns guide action simulation during narrative comprehension. Ditman T; Brunyé TT; Mahoney CR; Taylor HA Cognition; 2010 Apr; 115(1):172-8. PubMed ID: 19939357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Character movement and the representation of space during narrative comprehension. Rapp DN; Klug JL; Taylor HA Mem Cognit; 2006 Sep; 34(6):1206-20. PubMed ID: 17225503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Canceling updating in the comprehension of counterfactuals embedded in narratives. de Vega M; Urrutia M; Riffo B Mem Cognit; 2007 Sep; 35(6):1410-21. PubMed ID: 18035637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mentally simulating narrative perspective is not universal or necessary for language comprehension. Brunyé TT; Ditman T; Giles GE; Holmes A; Taylor HA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1592-1605. PubMed ID: 26889684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]