These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19487753)
1. Disjunctive illusory inferences and how to eliminate them. Khemlani S; Johnson-Laird PN Mem Cognit; 2009 Jul; 37(5):615-23. PubMed ID: 19487753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Illusory inferences: a novel class of erroneous deductions. Johnson-Laird PN; Savary F Cognition; 1999 Jul; 71(3):191-229. PubMed ID: 10476604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How to eliminate illusions in quantified reasoning. Yang Y; Johnson-Laird PN Mem Cognit; 2000 Sep; 28(6):1050-9. PubMed ID: 11105531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The consistency of disjunctive assertions. Johnson-Laird PN; Lotstein M; Byrne RM Mem Cognit; 2012 Jul; 40(5):769-78. PubMed ID: 22396128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Illusions in quantified reasoning: how to make the impossible seem possible, and vice versa. Yang Y; Johnson-Laird PN Mem Cognit; 2000 Apr; 28(3):452-65. PubMed ID: 10881562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Illusory inferences from a disjunction of conditionals: a new mental models account. Barrouillet P; Lecas JF Cognition; 2000 Aug; 76(2):167-73; discussion 175-8. PubMed ID: 10856742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Analytic Truth and Falsity of Disjunctions. Quelhas AC; Rasga C; Johnson-Laird PN Cogn Sci; 2019 Sep; 43(9):e12739. PubMed ID: 31529532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Counterexamples in sentential reasoning. Johnson-Laird PN; Hasson U Mem Cognit; 2003 Oct; 31(7):1105-13. PubMed ID: 14704025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Naïve deontics: a theory of meaning, representation, and reasoning. Bucciarelli M; Johnson-Laird PN Cogn Psychol; 2005 Mar; 50(2):159-93. PubMed ID: 15680143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An inverse belief-bias effect: more evidence for the role of inhibitory processes in logical reasoning. Markovits H; Saelen C; Forgues HL Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(2):112-20. PubMed ID: 19261586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A curious belief-bias effect: reasoning with false premises and inhibition of real-life information. Markovits H; Schroyens W Exp Psychol; 2007; 54(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 17341013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. More evidence for a dual-process model of conditional reasoning. Markovits H; Forgues HL; Brunet ML Mem Cognit; 2012 Jul; 40(5):736-47. PubMed ID: 22287219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reasoning with conditionals: a test of formal models of four theories. Oberauer K Cogn Psychol; 2006 Nov; 53(3):238-83. PubMed ID: 16729993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]