248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19488054)
1. How robust are your data?
Nat Cell Biol; 2009 Jun; 11(6):667. PubMed ID: 19488054
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Guidelines for reporting statistics in journals published by the American Physiological Society.
Curran-Everett D; Benos DJ
Adv Physiol Educ; 2004 Dec; 28(1-4):85-7. PubMed ID: 15319187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comments on journal guidelines for reporting statistics.
Ludbrook J
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2005 Apr; 32(4):324-6. PubMed ID: 15811000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. How to ensure your paper is rejected by the statistical reviewer.
Stratton IM; Neil A
Diabet Med; 2005 Apr; 22(4):371-3. PubMed ID: 15787658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Presentation of statistical analysis in the Journal of the Norwegian Medical Association].
Aamodt G; Gulbrandsen P; Laake P; Aavitsland P; Bretthauer M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2005 Aug; 125(16):2183-7. PubMed ID: 16138131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Statistical evaluation in Medicina (Buenos Aires)].
Gonorazky SE
Medicina (B Aires); 2001; 61(5 Pt 1):633. PubMed ID: 11721336
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The presentation of statistics in Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology.
Ludbrook J
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2008 Oct; 35(10):1271-4; author reply 1274. PubMed ID: 18954331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Image manipulation: CSI: cell biology.
Pearson H
Nature; 2005 Apr; 434(7036):952-3. PubMed ID: 15846316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Wanted: guidelines for reporting correlations.
Kay B
Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Jun; 33(2):134. PubMed ID: 19509401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Guidelines for statistical reporting.
Haller KB; Holditch-Davis D
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2000; 29(2):121. PubMed ID: 10750676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Scientific reporting guidelines].
Nylenna M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Nov; 129(22):2340. PubMed ID: 19935931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Science watchers wink at the logic].
Taube A
Lakartidningen; 1996 Apr; 93(16):1549-53; discussion 1553-5. PubMed ID: 8667757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Reporting guidelines for research: curse or blessing?].
Ziegler A
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2009 Oct; 134(41):2077. PubMed ID: 19802770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Statistical flaw trips up study of bad stats.
Giles J
Nature; 2006 Sep; 443(7110):379. PubMed ID: 17006479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. On instructions.
McDonald JC
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Apr; 145(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21355006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Why most published research findings are false: problems in the analysis.
Goodman S; Greenland S
PLoS Med; 2007 Apr; 4(4):e168. PubMed ID: 17456002
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Error message.
Vaux DL
Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6985):799. PubMed ID: 15103350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. You and your research report: implementing the ARRIVE reporting guideline.
Bomzon A
Lab Anim; 2017 Apr; 51(2):121-123. PubMed ID: 27838637
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [The PRISMA Statement - what should be reported about systematic reviews?].
Antes G; von Elm E
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2009 Aug; 134(33):1619. PubMed ID: 19650021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. STREGA, STROBE, STARD, SQUIRE, MOOSE, PRISMA, GNOSIS, TREND, ORION, COREQ, QUOROM, REMARK... and CONSORT: for whom does the guideline toll?
Vandenbroucke JP
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):594-6. PubMed ID: 19181482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
