BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19488555)

  • 1. The effect external and middle ears have in otoacoustic emissions.
    Couto CM; Carvallo RM
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2009; 75(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 19488555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationships among standard and wideband measures of middle ear function and distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Schairer KS; Morrison B; Szewczyk E; Fowler CG
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 May; 22(5):253-64. PubMed ID: 21756841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. External- and middle-ear factors affecting evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonates.
    Thornton AR; Kimm L; Kennedy CR; Cafarelli-Dees D
    Br J Audiol; 1993 Oct; 27(5):319-27. PubMed ID: 8205077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sweep frequency impedance measures in Australian Aboriginal and Caucasian neonates.
    Aithal V; Kei J; Driscoll C; Swanston A; Murakoshi M; Wada H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Jul; 79(7):1024-9. PubMed ID: 25930171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and tympanometric measurements in an adult population-based study.
    Uchida Y; Ando F; Nakata S; Ueda H; Nakashima T; Niino N; Shimokata H
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2006 Dec; 33(4):397-401. PubMed ID: 16753276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of negative middle ear pressure on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and application of a compensation procedure in humans.
    Sun XM; Shaver MD
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 19194291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of otoacoustic emissions in chinchilla when the middle ear contains amniotic fluid.
    Akinpelu OV; Funnell WR; Daniel SJ
    Laryngoscope; 2015 Apr; 125(4):E138-42. PubMed ID: 25431116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Wideband reflectance in newborns with present transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Silva KA; Urosas JG; Sanches SG; Carvallo RM
    Codas; 2013; 25(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 24408167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of static middle ear pressure on transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion products.
    Plinkert PK; Bootz F; Vossieck T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1994; 251(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 8024768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of middle ear pressure on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Trine MB; Hirsch JE; Margolis RH
    Ear Hear; 1993 Dec; 14(6):401-7. PubMed ID: 8307244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
    Hoth S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Could the Use of Acoustic Reflexes Prior to Administering Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAEs) Affect the Results of DPOAEs?
    Garrette R; Jones AL; Wilson MW
    Am J Audiol; 2018 Sep; 27(3):349-353. PubMed ID: 29800116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of changes in dynamic characteristics of the middle ear on transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Spirić S; Spirić P; Vranjes D; Aleksić A
    Med Pregl; 2011; 64(9-10):439-42. PubMed ID: 22097107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acoustic immittance in children without otoacoustic emissions.
    Linares AE; Carvallo RM
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2008; 74(3):410-6. PubMed ID: 18661016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ear canal pressure variations versus negative middle ear pressure: comparison using distortion product otoacoustic emission measurement in humans.
    Sun XM
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 21747284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of subtle auditory dysfunctions in young normal-hearing subjects affected by Williams syndrome.
    Paglialonga A; Barozzi S; Brambilla D; Soi D; Cesarani A; Spreafico E; Tognola G
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Nov; 78(11):1861-5. PubMed ID: 25193583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Results for audiology and distortion product and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.
    Karabulut H; Dagli M; Ates A; Karaaslan Y
    J Laryngol Otol; 2010 Feb; 124(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 19852869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A study on otoacoustic emissions and supression effects in patients with vitiligo.
    Angrisani RM; Azevedo MF; Pereira LD; Lopes C; Garcia MV
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2009; 75(1):111-5. PubMed ID: 19488570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Otoacoustic emissions and tympanometry in a general adult population in Sweden.
    Johansson MS; Arlinger SD
    Int J Audiol; 2003 Dec; 42(8):448-64. PubMed ID: 14658853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions. The influence of the middle ear transmission.
    Osterhammel PA; Nielsen LH; Rasmussen AN
    Scand Audiol; 1993; 22(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 8321995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.