These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19488566)

  • 21. Cochlear Implantation with the CI512 and CI532 Precurved Electrode Arrays: One-Year Speech Recognition and Intraoperative Thresholds of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials.
    Videhult Pierre P; Eklöf M; Smeds H; Asp F
    Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(6):299-308. PubMed ID: 31846976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Electrically evoked auditory nerve compound action potentials in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users].
    Zhu X; Cao K; Pan T; Yang H; Wang Y
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Jan; 16(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 11944479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Effects of GJB2 or SLC26A4 Gene Mutations on Neural Response of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve in Children.
    Luo J; Xu L; Chao X; Wang R; Pellittieri A; Bai X; Fan Z; Wang H; He S
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(1):194-207. PubMed ID: 31124793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Site of prelingual cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials and refractory using the Nucleus 24 standard].
    Ma RY; Li W; Jiang XJ
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Dec; 30(23):1854-1858. PubMed ID: 29798012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Systematic review of compound action potentials as predictors for cochlear implant performance.
    van Eijl RH; Buitenhuis PJ; Stegeman I; Klis SF; Grolman W
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Feb; 127(2):476-487. PubMed ID: 27804133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of Two Measurement Paradigms to Determine Electrically Evoked Cochlear Nerve Responses and Their Correlation to Cochlear Nerve Cross-section in Infants and Young Children With Cochlear Implant.
    Schrank L; Nachtigäller P; Müller J; Hempel JM; Canis M; Spiegel JL; Rader T
    Otol Neurotol; 2024 Mar; 45(3):e206-e213. PubMed ID: 38361306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Effect of Aging on Auditory Nerve Function: Insights from Intraoperative eCAP Recordings in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Mussoi BS; Woodson E; Sydlowski S
    Otol Neurotol; 2023 Jun; 44(5):447-452. PubMed ID: 37026816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of Neural Response Telemetry (NRT) results of cochlear implanted children in view of pre-operative Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR).
    Unsal S; Gunduz M
    Int Tinnitus J; 2019 Sep; 23(2):122-124. PubMed ID: 32009346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Correlation between neural response telemetry measurements and fitting levels.
    Ries M; Kelava I; Ajduk J; Košec A; Žaja R; Trotić R
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jul; 182():112001. PubMed ID: 38885546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The intraoperative application of neural response telemetry with the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant].
    Yang H; Tang J; Cao K; Zhu X; Wang Y; Pan T
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Oct; 36(5):352-6. PubMed ID: 12761943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Investigating the association of electrically-evoked compound action potential thresholds with inner-ear dimensions in pediatric cochlear implantation.
    Söderqvist S; Sivonen V; Lamminmäki S; Ylönen J; Markkola A; Sinkkonen ST
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Jul; 158():111160. PubMed ID: 35544967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Differences between electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) and behavioral measures in children with cochlear implants operated in the school age vs. operated in the first years of life.
    Vlahović S; Šindija B; Aras I; Glunčić M; Trotić R
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 May; 76(5):731-9. PubMed ID: 22398117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of long-term use of a cochlear implant on the electrically evoked compound action potential.
    Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Etlert CP; O'Brient S; Oleson JJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 20085195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.
    Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldán C; Schoesser H; Spitzer P
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of a novel, noninvasive, objective test of auditory nerve function in cochlear implant candidates.
    Gräbel S; Hirschfelder A; Scheiber C; Olze H
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):716-24. PubMed ID: 19704358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of cochlear implant electrode array design on auditory nerve and behavioral response in children.
    Telmesani LM; Said NM
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 May; 79(5):660-5. PubMed ID: 25746517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparing eSRT and eCAP measurements in pediatric MED-EL cochlear implant users.
    Kosaner J; Spitzer P; Bayguzina S; Gultekin M; Behar LA
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 May; 19(3):153-161. PubMed ID: 29291688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Threshold dynamics of the auditory nerve electrically evoked compound action potential in implanted children].
    Kechiyan DK; Bakhshinyan VV; Tavartkiladze GA
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2020; 85(6):17-22. PubMed ID: 33474911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
    Busby PA; Battmer RD; Pesch J
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Examining the auditory nerve fiber response to high rate cochlear implant stimulation: chronic sensorineural hearing loss and facilitation.
    Heffer LF; Sly DJ; Fallon JB; White MW; Shepherd RK; O'Leary SJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Dec; 104(6):3124-35. PubMed ID: 20926607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.