These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1948897)

  • 21. Knowledge and fears among Chilean women with regard to the Papanicolaou test.
    Lamadrid Alvarez S
    Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1996 Dec; 30(4):354-61. PubMed ID: 9041747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Mass screening against cervical cancer--what are the viewpoints of female general practitioners?].
    Krohg M; Malterud K
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1995 Mar; 115(7):817-9. PubMed ID: 7701487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Beyond opportunistic Pap smears in general practice. Women's views of strategies to promote regular screening.
    Ward J; D'Este C; Sanson-Fisher R
    Aust Fam Physician; 1993 Nov; 22(11):2032-4. PubMed ID: 8304859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of mammography and Pap test use from the 1987 and 1992 National Health Interview Surveys: are we closing the gaps?
    Martin LM; Calle EE; Wingo PA; Heath CW
    Am J Prev Med; 1996; 12(2):82-90. PubMed ID: 8777072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Knowledge, attitude, and practice of female health professionals regarding cervical cancer and Pap smear.
    Anya SE; Oshi DC; Nwosu SO; Anya AE
    Niger J Med; 2005; 14(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 16350698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Awareness and behavior about Pap smear testing in family medicine practice.
    Barghouti FF; Takruri AH; Froelicher ES
    Saudi Med J; 2008 Jul; 29(7):1036-40. PubMed ID: 18626537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Factors predicting the persistence of genital human papillomavirus infections and PAP smear abnormality in HIV-positive and HIV-negative women during prospective follow-up.
    Branca M; Garbuglia AR; Benedetto A; Cappiello T; Leoncini L; Migliore G; Agarossi A; Syrjänen K;
    Int J STD AIDS; 2003 Jun; 14(6):417-25. PubMed ID: 12816671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of patient and provider reminders on mammography and Papanicolaou smear screening in a large health maintenance organization.
    Somkin CP; Hiatt RA; Hurley LB; Gruskin E; Ackerson L; Larson P
    Arch Intern Med; 1997 Aug 11-25; 157(15):1658-64. PubMed ID: 9250226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparing acculturation scales and their relationship to cancer screening among older Mexican-American women.
    Suarez L; Pulley L
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):41-7. PubMed ID: 8562221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Are analyses of cytological cervix smears from young women more harmful than beneficial?].
    Skjeldestad FE; Hagen B; Hagmar B; Iversen OE; Juvkam KH; Steen R; Thoresen S; Hareide B
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Jun; 127(13):1782-5. PubMed ID: 17599128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Factors associated with Pap smear taking in general practice: focusing public health initiatives.
    Heywood A; Firman D; Ring I
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 1996 Jun; 20(3):260-6. PubMed ID: 8768415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Trends in mammography and Pap smear utilization in Canada.
    Snider J; Beauvais J; Levy I; Villeneuve P; Pennock J
    Chronic Dis Can; 1996; 17(3-4):108-17. PubMed ID: 9097011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Follow up after an abnormal pap smear: time interval acceptable, nature of follow up leaves room for improvement].
    Geertsen M; Bais AG; Beerman H; Helmerhorst TJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Dec; 147(49):2430-4. PubMed ID: 14694554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Papanicolaou smear as a sentinel screening test for health screening in women.
    Hueston WJ; Stiles MA
    Arch Intern Med; 1994 Jul; 154(13):1473-7. PubMed ID: 8018002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The pap-smear history of women with invasive cervical squamous carcinoma. A case-control study from Sweden.
    Andersson-Ellström A; Seidal T; Grannas M; Hagmar B
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Mar; 79(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 10716304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Notification of Pap smear results. A Victorian survey.
    Mitchell H; Medley G
    Aust Fam Physician; 1998 Jan; 27 Suppl 1():S7-10. PubMed ID: 9503728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cervical cleaning improves Pap smear quality.
    Kotaska AJ; Matisic JP
    CMAJ; 2003 Sep; 169(7):666-9. PubMed ID: 14517124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Mass screening for cervical cancer. A one-year registration of cervical cytological tests].
    Bjørge T; Gunbjørud AB; Langmark F; Skare GB; Thoresen SO
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1994 Jan; 114(3):341-5. PubMed ID: 8191435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Cervical smears taken by physicians' assistants are of lesser quality than smears taken by family physicians, but almost as good as the national average].
    Voordijk-van der Ben MH; Buntinx F
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jan; 144(2):74-7. PubMed ID: 10674106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Women's preferences for providers of and settings for Pap smears.
    Thompson M; Nussbaum R
    J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972); 2001; 56(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 11202065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.