These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19489259)

  • 1. [Three dimension finite element analysis of anisotropic mandible with dental implants effect on implant-bone interface].
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Zhang XH; Liao SH; Zhang-Lin ; Chen H
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Jan; 44(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 19489259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
    Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of anisotropy on peri-implant stress and strain in complete mandible model from CT.
    Liao SH; Tong RF; Dong JX
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Jan; 32(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 17951028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Finite element stress analysis of edentulous mandibles with different bone types supporting multiple-implant superstructures.
    de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Freitas MM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1108-14. PubMed ID: 21197486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combined effects of implant insertion depth and alveolar bone quality on periimplant bone strain induced by a wide-diameter, short implant and a narrow-diameter, long implant.
    Chou HY; Müftü S; Bozkaya D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Nov; 104(5):293-300. PubMed ID: 20970535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical evaluation of implant placement in the reconstructed mandible.
    Nagasao T; Miyamoto J; Kawana H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):999-1005. PubMed ID: 20162103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bone stress analysis of various angulations of mesiodistal implants with splinted crowns in the posterior mandible: a three-dimensional finite element study.
    Lan TH; Pan CY; Lee HE; Huang HL; Wang CH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):763-70. PubMed ID: 20657872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Zampelis A; Rangert B; Heijl L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S35-43. PubMed ID: 17618932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigation of bone inelastic response in interaction phenomena with dental implants.
    Natali AN; Carniel EL; Pavan PG
    Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):561-9. PubMed ID: 18207565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A three-dimensional finite element study on two versus four implants in an edentulous mandible.
    Meijer HJ; Starmans FJ; Steen WH; Bosman F
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 7916894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of cortical bone thickness and implant length on bone strain and interfacial micromotion in an immediately loaded implant.
    Tu MG; Hsu JT; Fuh LJ; Lin DJ; Huang HL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):706-14. PubMed ID: 20657865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
    Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.
    Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implants.
    Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):722-30. PubMed ID: 11669255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stress and strain distribution behavior in the bone due to the effect of cancellous bone, dental implant material and the bone height.
    Hedia HS
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2002; 12(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 12122235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of different fixture geometries on the stress distribution in mandibular peri-implant structures: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Degerliyurt K; Simsek B; Erkmen E; Eser A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Aug; 110(2):e1-11. PubMed ID: 20598590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shape optimization of dental implants.
    Shi L; Li H; Fok AS; Ucer C; Devlin H; Horner K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):911-20. PubMed ID: 18271372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of finite element analysis to model bone-implant contact with basal implants.
    Ihde S; Goldmann T; Himmlova L; Aleksic Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul; 106(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 18439855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of a hydroxyapatite-reinforced polyethylene stress distributor in a dental implant on compressive stress levels in surrounding bone.
    Abu-Hammad OA; Harrison A; Williams D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(4):559-64. PubMed ID: 10960990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.