1349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19489933)
1. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants: a 10-year clinical trial.
Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Batenburg RH; Visser A; Vissink A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):722-8. PubMed ID: 19489933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus conventional dentures: 10 years of care and aftercare.
Visser A; Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 16752625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures.
Alfadda SA; Attard NJ; David LA
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19639074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized clinical trial comparing patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants.
Walton JN; Glick N; Macentee MI
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):331-9. PubMed ID: 19639067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical and radiologic evaluation of 2-stage IMZ implants placed in a single-stage procedure: 2-year results of a prospective comparative study.
Heydenrijk K; Raghoebar GM; Meijer HJ; Stegenga B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):424-32. PubMed ID: 12814319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mandibular overdentures supported by 6-mm dental implants: a 1-year prospective cohort study.
Guljé F; Raghoebar GM; Ter Meulen JW; Vissink A; Meijer HJ
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e59-66. PubMed ID: 21745319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.
De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical and radiological results of patients treated with two loading protocols for mandibular overdentures on Brånemark implants.
Turkyilmaz I
J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Mar; 33(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 16489951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study.
Bakke M; Holm B; Gotfredsen K
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12475165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A longitudinal study on mandibular implants supporting an overdenture: the influence of retention mechanism and anatomic-prosthetic variables on periimplant parameters.
Oetterli M; Kiener P; Mericske-Stern R
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(6):536-42. PubMed ID: 12066700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants. A 5-year prospective study.
Visser A; Raghoebar GM; Meijer HJ; Batenburg RH; Vissink A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Feb; 16(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 15642027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of prefabricated and custom-made bars used for implant-retained mandibular complete overdentures.
Abd El-Dayem MA; Assad AS; Eldin Sanad ME; Mahmoud Mogahed SA
Implant Dent; 2009 Dec; 18(6):501-11. PubMed ID: 20009604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of ball and telescopic crown attachments in implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 5-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Seemann R; Weinländer M; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 21691608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of implant-retained mandibular overdentures and conventional complete dentures: a 10-year prospective study of clinical aspects and patient satisfaction.
Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Van 't Hof MA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 14696664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stability and marginal bone level measurements of unsplinted implants used for mandibular overdentures: a 1-year randomized prospective clinical study comparing early and conventional loading protocols.
Turkyilmaz I; Sennerby L; Tumer C; Yenigul M; Avci M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):501-5. PubMed ID: 16958688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized prospective clinical trial on the effectiveness of three treatment modalities for patients with lower denture problems. A 10 year follow-up study on patient satisfaction.
Raghoebar GM; Meijer HJ; van 't Hof M; Stegenga B; Vissink A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Oct; 32(5):498-503. PubMed ID: 14759108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Restoration with implants in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa and patient satisfaction with the implant-supported superstructure.
Peñarrocha M; Larrazábal C; Balaguer J; Serrano C; Silvestre J; Bagán JV
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):651-5. PubMed ID: 17929528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Removable implant-prosthodontic rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible: five-year results of different prosthetic anchorage concepts.
Weinländer M; Piehslinger E; Krennmair G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):589-97. PubMed ID: 20556260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized multicenter comparison of 2 IMZ and 4 TPS screw implants supporting bar-retained overdentures in 425 edentulous mandibles.
Mau J; Behneke A; Behneke N; Fritzemeier CU; Gomez-Roman G; d'Hoedt B; Spiekermann H; Strunz V; Yong M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):835-47. PubMed ID: 14696659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Denture satisfaction in a comparative study of implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a randomized clinical trial.
Geertman ME; van Waas MA; van 't Hof MA; Kalk W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 8666450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
