These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19490190)

  • 21. How to use a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
    Tseng TY; Dahm P; Poolman RW; Preminger GM; Canales BJ; Montori VM
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1249-56. PubMed ID: 18707741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Editorial. Systematic review--what is it and how should it be used?
    Gross A
    Man Ther; 2004 Aug; 9(3):123-4. PubMed ID: 15245705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.
    Tierney JF; Stewart LA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15561753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Editorial comment on: tension-free midurethral slings in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of effectiveness.
    Costantini E
    Eur Urol; 2007 Sep; 52(3):678-9. PubMed ID: 17601653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An encouraging assessment of methods to inform priorities for updating systematic reviews.
    Sutton AJ; Donegan S; Takwoingi Y; Garner P; Gamble C; Donald A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Mar; 62(3):241-51. PubMed ID: 18783919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The reporting quality of meta-analyses improves: a random sampling study.
    Wen J; Ren Y; Wang L; Li Y; Liu Y; Zhou M; Liu P; Ye L; Li Y; Tian W
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):770-5. PubMed ID: 18411041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Adjustment of meta-analyses on the basis of quality scores should be abandoned.
    Herbison P; Hay-Smith J; Gillespie WJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 59(12):1249-56. PubMed ID: 17098567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Intrapartum amnioinfusion for meconium-stained amniotic fluid: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
    Sanchez-Ramos L
    BJOG; 2008 Feb; 115(3):409-10; author reply 410. PubMed ID: 18190380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Understanding systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
    Akobeng AK
    Arch Dis Child; 2005 Aug; 90(8):845-8. PubMed ID: 16040886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Susceptibility to fraud in systematic reviews: lessons from the Reuben case.
    Marret E; Elia N; Dahl JB; McQuay HJ; Møiniche S; Moore RA; Straube S; Tramèr MR
    Anesthesiology; 2009 Dec; 111(6):1279-89. PubMed ID: 19934873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A review of evidence-based medicine and meta-analytic reviews in migraine.
    Tfelt-Hansen P
    Cephalalgia; 2006 Nov; 26(11):1265-74. PubMed ID: 17059433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Qualitative methods: systematic reviews in qualitative health-care research as a basis for evidence-based practice].
    Hasseler M
    Gesundheitswesen; 2007 May; 69(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 17582547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Systematic reviews involving complementary and alternative medicine interventions had higher quality of reporting than conventional medicine reviews.
    Lawson ML; Pham B; Klassen TP; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 58(8):777-84. PubMed ID: 16018912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A practical guide to understanding systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Neely JG; Magit AE; Rich JT; Voelker CC; Wang EW; Paniello RC; Nussenbaum B; Bradley JP
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Jan; 142(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 20096216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Users' guide to the surgical literature: how to use a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
    Bhandari M; Devereaux PJ; Montori V; Cinà C; Tandan V; Guyatt GH;
    Can J Surg; 2004 Feb; 47(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 14997929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Introduction to randomized trials: assessing the quality of randomized trials].
    Simon EG; Fouché CJ; Perrotin F
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Feb; 40(2):135-7. PubMed ID: 22281288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Clinical equipoise and systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials].
    Catalá-López F; González-Bermejo D; de la Fuente Honrubia C; Macías Saint-Gerons D
    Med Clin (Barc); 2015 Dec; 145(11):496-8. PubMed ID: 26004273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
    Lewis G; Churchill R; Hotopp M
    Psychol Med; 1997 Jan; 27(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 9122306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Systematic reviews: what are they and why should we care?
    Albanese M; Norcini J
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2002; 7(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 12075146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. From narrative to systematic reviews and meta-analyses in assessing the effectiveness of psychiatric treatments.
    Tansella M
    Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc; 2003; 12(3):135-6. PubMed ID: 14610847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.